Objective: To determine the prevalence of complications in patients with COVID-19 undergone prone positioning, focusing on the development of prone-related pressure ulcers. Methods: Cross-sectional study conducted in the hub COVID-19 centre in Milan (Italy), between March and June 2020. All patients with COVID-19 admitted to intensive care unit on invasive mechanical ventilation and treated with prone positioning were included. Association between prone-related pressure ulcers and selected variables was explored by the means of logistic regression. Results: A total of 219 proning cycles were performed on 63 patients, aged 57.6 (10.8) and predominantly obese males (66.7%). The main complications recorded were: prone-related pressure ulcers (30.2%), bleeding (25.4%) and medical device displacement (12.7%), even if no unplanned extubation was recorded. The majority of patients (17.5%) experienced bleeding of upper airways. Only 15 prone positioning cycles (6.8%) were interrupted, requiring staff to roll the patient back in the supine position. The likelihood of pressure ulcers development was independently associated with the duration of prone positioning, once adjusting for age, hypoxemic level, and nutritional status (OR 1.9, 95%CI 1.04–3.6). Conclusion: The use of prone positioning in patients with COVID-19 was a safe and feasible treatment, also in obese patients, who might deserve more surveillance and active prevention by intensive care unit staff.

Complications of prone positioning in patients with COVID-19: A cross-sectional study / F. Binda, A. Galazzi, F. Marelli, S. Gambazza, L. Villa, E. Vinci, I. Adamini, D. Laquintana. - In: INTENSIVE & CRITICAL CARE NURSING. - ISSN 0964-3397. - 67:(2021 Dec), pp. 103088.1-103088.7. [10.1016/j.iccn.2021.103088]

Complications of prone positioning in patients with COVID-19: A cross-sectional study

S. Gambazza;
2021

Abstract

Objective: To determine the prevalence of complications in patients with COVID-19 undergone prone positioning, focusing on the development of prone-related pressure ulcers. Methods: Cross-sectional study conducted in the hub COVID-19 centre in Milan (Italy), between March and June 2020. All patients with COVID-19 admitted to intensive care unit on invasive mechanical ventilation and treated with prone positioning were included. Association between prone-related pressure ulcers and selected variables was explored by the means of logistic regression. Results: A total of 219 proning cycles were performed on 63 patients, aged 57.6 (10.8) and predominantly obese males (66.7%). The main complications recorded were: prone-related pressure ulcers (30.2%), bleeding (25.4%) and medical device displacement (12.7%), even if no unplanned extubation was recorded. The majority of patients (17.5%) experienced bleeding of upper airways. Only 15 prone positioning cycles (6.8%) were interrupted, requiring staff to roll the patient back in the supine position. The likelihood of pressure ulcers development was independently associated with the duration of prone positioning, once adjusting for age, hypoxemic level, and nutritional status (OR 1.9, 95%CI 1.04–3.6). Conclusion: The use of prone positioning in patients with COVID-19 was a safe and feasible treatment, also in obese patients, who might deserve more surveillance and active prevention by intensive care unit staff.
COVID-19; Intensive Care Units; Obesity; Pressure Ulcers; Prone Position; Respiratory Distress Syndrome;
Settore MED/45 - Scienze Infermieristiche Generali, Cliniche e Pediatriche
Settore MED/01 - Statistica Medica
dic-2021
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
main (3).pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 563.35 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
563.35 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/875256
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 19
  • Scopus 44
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 39
social impact