This article addresses the issues raised by non-proportional de-mergers of joint stock companies splitting up shareholders into different beneficiary entities. A discussion is engaged as to whether such de-mergers must be approved with the unanimous consent of all shareholders or may also be approved by shareholders’ majority required to resolve on by-laws amendments. In the latter case, minority shareholders not concurring with the resolution would be entitled to withdraw from the company. In this framework, an analysis is developed to show how Italian corporate law has increasingly replaced an approach on minorities’ protection based on the assignment of individual rights and veto powers, with a different regime founded on the majority rule and the assignment of exit rights to minorities. Finally, the article focuses on possible reasons underlying the Italian corporate rule requiring the unanimous consent of all shareholders for approval of asymmetrical demergers (pursuant to which shareholders are assigned shares of the demerged company in lieu of the shares of the beneficiary entities).

La scissione estrema tra poteri di veto e disinvestimento / N. Baccetti. - In: RIVISTA DEL DIRITTO COMMERCIALE E DEL DIRITTO GENERALE DELLE OBBLIGAZIONI. - ISSN 0035-5887. - 119:3(2021), pp. 433-465.

La scissione estrema tra poteri di veto e disinvestimento

N. Baccetti
2021

Abstract

This article addresses the issues raised by non-proportional de-mergers of joint stock companies splitting up shareholders into different beneficiary entities. A discussion is engaged as to whether such de-mergers must be approved with the unanimous consent of all shareholders or may also be approved by shareholders’ majority required to resolve on by-laws amendments. In the latter case, minority shareholders not concurring with the resolution would be entitled to withdraw from the company. In this framework, an analysis is developed to show how Italian corporate law has increasingly replaced an approach on minorities’ protection based on the assignment of individual rights and veto powers, with a different regime founded on the majority rule and the assignment of exit rights to minorities. Finally, the article focuses on possible reasons underlying the Italian corporate rule requiring the unanimous consent of all shareholders for approval of asymmetrical demergers (pursuant to which shareholders are assigned shares of the demerged company in lieu of the shares of the beneficiary entities).
No
Italian
Società di capitali; scissione non proporzionali; scissione asimmetriche; scissione estrema; separazione della compagine sociale; consenso unanime dei soci; diritti individuali dei soci e poteri di veto; principio di maggioranza e modificazioni statutarie; diritto di recesso o di disinvestimento.
Settore IUS/04 - Diritto Commerciale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Ricerca di base
Pubblicazione scientifica
2021
Piccin
119
3
433
465
32
Pubblicato
Periodico con rilevanza internazionale
manual
Aderisco
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
La scissione estrema tra poteri di veto e disinvestimento / N. Baccetti. - In: RIVISTA DEL DIRITTO COMMERCIALE E DEL DIRITTO GENERALE DELLE OBBLIGAZIONI. - ISSN 0035-5887. - 119:3(2021), pp. 433-465.
reserved
Prodotti della ricerca::01 - Articolo su periodico
1
262
Article (author)
Periodico senza Impact Factor
N. Baccetti
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Estratto pdf La scissione estrema.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 1.91 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.91 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/867082
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact