“The struggle for understanding”. Words, language games, local ideologies and cosmopolitism by Vincenzo Matera The philosopher of language Ludwig Wittgenstein, although often held to be such, was not a relativist. His thought – concerning forms of live and language games – was misunderstood and reduced to the formula “The limits of my world determine the limits of my language”, that is, the limits of the language games I can play, of my intersubjective system of references, of my areas of social interaction are the limits of my com- prehension: what I can understand, judge, my values etc., is embedded into the space I live in, sharply sep- arated from other spaces and other worlds and other languages. Wittgenstein, in my opinion, does not state this; the misunderstanding can be resumed in the statement: “If a lion could speak, we could not understand him”. In this article I argue for a wide and universalist comprehension of wittgensteinian thought, based on a deepening of the link between words, practices, experience, ideology.

“Comprendersi con fatica”. Parole, giochi linguistici, ideologie locali e cosmopolitismo / V. Matera. - In: LA RICERCA FOLKLORICA. - ISSN 0391-9099. - 75:(2020), pp. 193-206.

“Comprendersi con fatica”. Parole, giochi linguistici, ideologie locali e cosmopolitismo

V. Matera
2020

Abstract

“The struggle for understanding”. Words, language games, local ideologies and cosmopolitism by Vincenzo Matera The philosopher of language Ludwig Wittgenstein, although often held to be such, was not a relativist. His thought – concerning forms of live and language games – was misunderstood and reduced to the formula “The limits of my world determine the limits of my language”, that is, the limits of the language games I can play, of my intersubjective system of references, of my areas of social interaction are the limits of my com- prehension: what I can understand, judge, my values etc., is embedded into the space I live in, sharply sep- arated from other spaces and other worlds and other languages. Wittgenstein, in my opinion, does not state this; the misunderstanding can be resumed in the statement: “If a lion could speak, we could not understand him”. In this article I argue for a wide and universalist comprehension of wittgensteinian thought, based on a deepening of the link between words, practices, experience, ideology.
understanding; relativism; universalism; words; experience; ideologies.
Settore M-DEA/01 - Discipline Demoetnoantropologiche
2021
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Matera_RF75.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 161.63 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
161.63 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Caricamento pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/2434/866207
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact