Over the last years, a surge of empirical studies converged on complexity-related measures as reliable markers of consciousness across many different conditions, such as sleep, anesthesia, hallucinatory states, coma, and related disorders. Most of these measures were independently proposed by researchers endorsing disparate frameworks and employing different methods and techniques. Since this body of evidence has not been systematically reviewed and coherently organized so far, this positive trend has remained somewhat below the radar. The aim of this paper is to make this consilience of evidence in the science of consciousness explicit. We start with a systematic assessment of the growing literature on complexity-related measures and identify their common denominator, tracing it back to core theoretical principles and predictions put forward more than 20 years ago. In doing this, we highlight a consistent trajectory spanning two decades of consciousness research and provide a provisional taxonomy of the present literature. Finally, we consider all of the above as a positive ground to approach new questions and devise future experiments that may help consolidate and further develop a promising field where empirical research on consciousness appears to have, so far, naturally converged.

Consciousness and complexity: a consilience of evidence / S. Sarasso, A. Girardi Casali, S. Casarotto, M.C.E. Rosanova, C. Sinigaglia, M. Massimini. - In: NEUROSCIENCE OF CONSCIOUSNESS. - ISSN 2057-2107. - 7:2(2021 Aug 30), pp. 1-24. [10.1093/nc/niab023]

Consciousness and complexity: a consilience of evidence

Simone Sarasso;Silvia Casarotto;Mario Rosanova;Corrado Sinigaglia;Marcello Massimini
2021-08-30

Abstract

Over the last years, a surge of empirical studies converged on complexity-related measures as reliable markers of consciousness across many different conditions, such as sleep, anesthesia, hallucinatory states, coma, and related disorders. Most of these measures were independently proposed by researchers endorsing disparate frameworks and employing different methods and techniques. Since this body of evidence has not been systematically reviewed and coherently organized so far, this positive trend has remained somewhat below the radar. The aim of this paper is to make this consilience of evidence in the science of consciousness explicit. We start with a systematic assessment of the growing literature on complexity-related measures and identify their common denominator, tracing it back to core theoretical principles and predictions put forward more than 20 years ago. In doing this, we highlight a consistent trajectory spanning two decades of consciousness research and provide a provisional taxonomy of the present literature. Finally, we consider all of the above as a positive ground to approach new questions and devise future experiments that may help consolidate and further develop a promising field where empirical research on consciousness appears to have, so far, naturally converged.
sleep; coma; anesthesia; information; integration;
Settore BIO/09 - Fisiologia
Settore MED/26 - Neurologia
Human Brain Project Specific Grant Agreement 3 (HBP SGA3)
NEUROSCIENCE OF CONSCIOUSNESS
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
NeuroscienceOfConsciousness_Aug2021.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 2.06 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.06 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Caricamento pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/2434/865508
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact