Noble gas chemistry is fascinating because noble gases can make formal chemical bonds with metal ions, despite their closed electronic configuration. Argon–metal ion complexes are particularly interesting since their bonding is halfway between dispersion and covalent interactions. Although many metal ion–noble gas complexes have been synthesized, there are still disagreeing theoretical descriptions about their bonding, which is not yet fully understood. Accurate experimental data are important as solid reference for theoretical methodologies, but such data are currently scarce for complexes of a metal ion with noble gas atoms. We measured infrared spectra of MArn+ (n = 3–5; M = Au, Ag, Pd) complexes and used these spectra as benchmark data for different theory levels within the density functional theory formalism. Several basis sets, exchange–correlation functionals, and the inclusion of dispersion corrections were considered. The agreement between the measured spectra and the calculations strongly depends on the applied level of theory. Functionals of a higher level of complexity do not consistently provide a better agreement with the experiment; this is particularly the case for the B3LYP hybrid functional that performs worse than the PBE GGA functional. On the other hand, the inclusion of dispersion corrections and the use of a large basis sets are crucial for a good description of the interaction between M+ and argon atoms.

Benchmarking density functional theory methods for modelling cationic metal–argon complexes / L. Delgado-Callico, P. Ferrari, J.M. Bakker, F. Baletto, E. Janssens. - In: THEORETICAL CHEMISTRY ACCOUNTS. - ISSN 1432-881X. - 140:4(2021), pp. 38.1-38.9. [10.1007/s00214-021-02734-z]

Benchmarking density functional theory methods for modelling cationic metal–argon complexes

F. Baletto;
2021

Abstract

Noble gas chemistry is fascinating because noble gases can make formal chemical bonds with metal ions, despite their closed electronic configuration. Argon–metal ion complexes are particularly interesting since their bonding is halfway between dispersion and covalent interactions. Although many metal ion–noble gas complexes have been synthesized, there are still disagreeing theoretical descriptions about their bonding, which is not yet fully understood. Accurate experimental data are important as solid reference for theoretical methodologies, but such data are currently scarce for complexes of a metal ion with noble gas atoms. We measured infrared spectra of MArn+ (n = 3–5; M = Au, Ag, Pd) complexes and used these spectra as benchmark data for different theory levels within the density functional theory formalism. Several basis sets, exchange–correlation functionals, and the inclusion of dispersion corrections were considered. The agreement between the measured spectra and the calculations strongly depends on the applied level of theory. Functionals of a higher level of complexity do not consistently provide a better agreement with the experiment; this is particularly the case for the B3LYP hybrid functional that performs worse than the PBE GGA functional. On the other hand, the inclusion of dispersion corrections and the use of a large basis sets are crucial for a good description of the interaction between M+ and argon atoms.
Density functional theory; Dispersion interactions; Infrared spectroscopy; Metal ions; Noble gas chemistry
Settore FIS/03 - Fisica della Materia
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Delgado-Callico2021_TCA_BenchmarkingDensityFunctionalT.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 1.06 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.06 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Caricamento pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/2434/864984
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact