The European Union has recently strengthened its legal tools to react against measures adopted by third States in breach of their obligations under international trade agreements. In particular, the amendments to the so-called enforcement regulation which entered into force in February 2021 allow the European Commission to adopt countermeasures against a State which fails to cooperate in the functioning of the dispute settlement mechanisms established under the Dispute Settlement Understanding of the World Trade Organization or under any bilateral trade agreement concluded with the European Union. However, any potential EU countermeasures adopted according to these new rules would be likewise unlawful under international trade law. Against this background, the present contribution develops three strands of analysis: first, a critical appraisal of the legal justification invoked by the European Commission on the basis of the 2001 Draft Articles of the International Law Commission on the Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts; second, the legitimacy of EU countermeasures as a reaction against the violation by the State concerned of the principle of good faith in the peaceful settlement of disputes; finally, the suggestion that EU self-help actions could be deemed lawful according to the regime failure doctrine.

Regime Failure e contromisure unilaterali : la modifica dell'Enforcement Regulation dell’Unione Europea / G. Adinolfi. - In: RIVISTA DI DIRITTO INTERNAZIONALE. - ISSN 0035-6158. - 104:2(2021 Jun), pp. 319-352.

Regime Failure e contromisure unilaterali : la modifica dell'Enforcement Regulation dell’Unione Europea

G. Adinolfi
Primo
2021

Abstract

The European Union has recently strengthened its legal tools to react against measures adopted by third States in breach of their obligations under international trade agreements. In particular, the amendments to the so-called enforcement regulation which entered into force in February 2021 allow the European Commission to adopt countermeasures against a State which fails to cooperate in the functioning of the dispute settlement mechanisms established under the Dispute Settlement Understanding of the World Trade Organization or under any bilateral trade agreement concluded with the European Union. However, any potential EU countermeasures adopted according to these new rules would be likewise unlawful under international trade law. Against this background, the present contribution develops three strands of analysis: first, a critical appraisal of the legal justification invoked by the European Commission on the basis of the 2001 Draft Articles of the International Law Commission on the Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts; second, the legitimacy of EU countermeasures as a reaction against the violation by the State concerned of the principle of good faith in the peaceful settlement of disputes; finally, the suggestion that EU self-help actions could be deemed lawful according to the regime failure doctrine.
diritto del commercio internazionale; UE; OMC; contromisure unilaterali
Settore IUS/13 - Diritto Internazionale
giu-2021
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2021 - Regime failure RDI.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 668.07 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
668.07 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/855887
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact