The ongoing issuing of regulations in order to face the emergency stemming from the pandemic represents an interesting test to verify the integrity of our traditional system of protection of general interests. This system consists in the combination of general law, abstract and durable over time, on the one hand, and typical and punctual administrative provision, on the other. The orders of necessity and urgency are highly symbolic and emblematic, because they show a problematic relationship between law and power. The technique of using general principles (such as the principle of sincere cooperation, the principle of state supremacy, the principle of subsidiarity, the principle of reasonableness, the principle of proportionality, the precautionary principle and the principle of solidarity) must be rened in order to strike a balance between the rule and the exception. The excesses - of centralism, regionalism, authoritarianism and individualism - are always dangerous.
L’incessante produzione normativa per la gestione dell’emergenza pandemica costituisce un interessante banco di prova per verificare la tenuta del nostro sistema tradizionale di tutela degli interessi generali che si identifica nel binomio legge generale, astratta e durevole nel tempo, da un lato, e provvedimento amministrativo tipico e puntuale, dall’altro. Le ordinanze di necessità e urgenza rivestono valore fortemente simbolico e carattere emblematico, perché mostrano un problematico rapporto tra diritto e potere. Per trovare un punto d’equilibrio tra regola ed eccezione occorre raffinare la tecnica del ricorso ai principi generali (principio di leale collaborazione, principio di supremazia dello Stato, principio di sussidiarietà, principio di ragionevolezza, principio di proporzionalità, principio di precauzione e principio di solidarietà). Gli eccessi -di centralismo, di regionalismo, di autoritarismo, di individualismo- sono sempre pericolosi.
La gestione dell’emergenza pandemica tra Schmitt e Kelsen / M.M. Ramajoli. - In: CERIDAP. - ISSN 2723-9195. - 2021:2(2021), pp. 98-108. [10.13130/2723-9195/2021-2-17]
La gestione dell’emergenza pandemica tra Schmitt e Kelsen
M.M. Ramajoli
2021
Abstract
The ongoing issuing of regulations in order to face the emergency stemming from the pandemic represents an interesting test to verify the integrity of our traditional system of protection of general interests. This system consists in the combination of general law, abstract and durable over time, on the one hand, and typical and punctual administrative provision, on the other. The orders of necessity and urgency are highly symbolic and emblematic, because they show a problematic relationship between law and power. The technique of using general principles (such as the principle of sincere cooperation, the principle of state supremacy, the principle of subsidiarity, the principle of reasonableness, the principle of proportionality, the precautionary principle and the principle of solidarity) must be rened in order to strike a balance between the rule and the exception. The excesses - of centralism, regionalism, authoritarianism and individualism - are always dangerous.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
La gestione dell’emergenza pandemica tra Schmitt e Kelsen – CERIDAP.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione
143.58 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
143.58 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.