According to some author, when researchers are called to express a judgment over their peers, they might exhibit an epistemic bias that make them favoring those who belong to their School of Thought (SoT). A dominant SoT is also most likely to provide some advantage to its members’ bibliometric indexes, because more people potentially means more citations. In the long run, even the slight preference for one SoT over the others might lead to a monopoly, hampering the oft-invoked pluralism of research. In academic recruitment, given that those who recruited to permanent position will often become the recruiter of tomorrow, such biases might give rise to a self-reinforcing loop. However, the way in which this dynamic unfolds is affected by the institutional infrastructure that regulates academic recruitment. To reason on how the import of epistemic bias changes across various infrastructures, we built a simple Agent-Based Model using NetLogo 6.0.4., in which researchers belonging to rival SoTs compete to get promoted to professors. The model allows to represent the effect of epistemic and bibliometric biases, as well as to figure out how they get affected by the modification of several parameters.

Reclutamento accademico: come tutelare il pluralismo epistemico? Un modello di simulazione ad agenti / C. Debernardi, E. Priori, M. Viola. - In: SISTEMI INTELLIGENTI. - ISSN 1120-9550. - 33:1(2021 Apr), pp. 197-215. [10.1422/97367]

Reclutamento accademico: come tutelare il pluralismo epistemico? Un modello di simulazione ad agenti

C. Debernardi
;
2021-04

Abstract

According to some author, when researchers are called to express a judgment over their peers, they might exhibit an epistemic bias that make them favoring those who belong to their School of Thought (SoT). A dominant SoT is also most likely to provide some advantage to its members’ bibliometric indexes, because more people potentially means more citations. In the long run, even the slight preference for one SoT over the others might lead to a monopoly, hampering the oft-invoked pluralism of research. In academic recruitment, given that those who recruited to permanent position will often become the recruiter of tomorrow, such biases might give rise to a self-reinforcing loop. However, the way in which this dynamic unfolds is affected by the institutional infrastructure that regulates academic recruitment. To reason on how the import of epistemic bias changes across various infrastructures, we built a simple Agent-Based Model using NetLogo 6.0.4., in which researchers belonging to rival SoTs compete to get promoted to professors. The model allows to represent the effect of epistemic and bibliometric biases, as well as to figure out how they get affected by the modification of several parameters.
hiring; sociology of science; epistemic pluralism; evaluation; social epistemology; agent-based model
Settore M-FIL/02 - Logica e Filosofia della Scienza
Settore SPS/07 - Sociologia Generale
https://www.rivisteweb.it/issn/1120-9550/issue/8188
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Bias epistemici nel reclutamento accademico - un modello di simulazione ad agenti.pdf

embargo fino al 01/10/2022

Tipologia: Pre-print (manoscritto inviato all'editore)
Dimensione 612.72 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
612.72 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
1120-9550-29797-12.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 927.06 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
927.06 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Caricamento pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/2434/853731
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact