The social and political implications of the COVID-19 pandemic are receiving increasing attention in the literature. This article aims to contribute to this fast-growing research programme by focusing on the degree to which Italian citizens perceive democratic institutions as effective in coping with crises like the COVID-19 emergency. We put forward a set of hypotheses whereby negative evaluations of the effectiveness of democracy can be associated with social proximity to the disease and with perceived health and economic threats. We also argued that political factors can interact with such threats. Moreover, we hypothesised that certain factors dealing with the concepts of social capital and civic culture can help inhibit negative opinions about the effectiveness of democracy. To test these hypotheses, we analysed public opinion data collected in Italy between April and July 2020 using a Rolling Cross-Section survey design. The data showed that evaluations of democracy became more negative with social proximity to the disease and with individual perceived vulnerability, understood in health and economic terms. Our findings also highlighted that certain social factors which "underpin" democracy moderated negative evaluations. Finally, political factors like ideology and government appraisal shaped the relationship between individual threats and evaluations of democracy.

Is Democracy Effective against Coronavirus? An Analysis of Citizens' Opinions in Italy / A. Pedrazzani, M. Maraffi, S. Guglielmi, F. Biolcati Rinaldi, A.M. Chiesi, G.M. Dotti Sani, R. Ladini, F. Molteni, P. Segatti, C. Vezzoni. - In: PARTECIPAZIONE E CONFLITTO. - ISSN 2035-6609. - 14:1(2021), pp. 176-201.

Is Democracy Effective against Coronavirus? An Analysis of Citizens' Opinions in Italy

A. Pedrazzani
;
M. Maraffi;S. Guglielmi;F. Biolcati Rinaldi;A.M. Chiesi;G.M. Dotti Sani;R. Ladini;F. Molteni;P. Segatti;C. Vezzoni
2021

Abstract

The social and political implications of the COVID-19 pandemic are receiving increasing attention in the literature. This article aims to contribute to this fast-growing research programme by focusing on the degree to which Italian citizens perceive democratic institutions as effective in coping with crises like the COVID-19 emergency. We put forward a set of hypotheses whereby negative evaluations of the effectiveness of democracy can be associated with social proximity to the disease and with perceived health and economic threats. We also argued that political factors can interact with such threats. Moreover, we hypothesised that certain factors dealing with the concepts of social capital and civic culture can help inhibit negative opinions about the effectiveness of democracy. To test these hypotheses, we analysed public opinion data collected in Italy between April and July 2020 using a Rolling Cross-Section survey design. The data showed that evaluations of democracy became more negative with social proximity to the disease and with individual perceived vulnerability, understood in health and economic terms. Our findings also highlighted that certain social factors which "underpin" democracy moderated negative evaluations. Finally, political factors like ideology and government appraisal shaped the relationship between individual threats and evaluations of democracy.
COVID-19; Democracy; Economic insecurity; Health threat; Rolling Cross-Section
Settore SPS/04 - Scienza Politica
Settore SPS/11 - Sociologia dei Fenomeni Politici
Settore SPS/07 - Sociologia Generale
2021
http://siba-ese.unisalento.it/index.php/paco/article/view/24021
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Pedrazzani Maraffi Guglielmi Biolcati Chiesi Dotti Sani Molteni Ladini Segatti Vezzoni 2021.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 705.85 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
705.85 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/853029
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact