This article analyzes the problem of complicity in wrongdoing in the case of healthcare practitioners (and in particular Roman Catholic ones) who refuse to perform abortions, but who are nonetheless required to facilitate abortions by informing their patients about this option and by referring them to a willing colleague. Although this solution is widely supported in the literature and is also widely represented in much legislation, the argument here is that it fails to both (1) safeguard the well-being of the patients, and (2) protect the moral integrity of healthcare practitioners. Finally, the article proposes a new solution to this problem that is based on a desirable ratio of conscientious objectors to non-conscientious objectors in a hospital or in a given geographic area.

Conscientious objection, complicity in wrongdoing, and a not-so-moderate approach / F. MInerva. - In: CAMBRIDGE QUARTERLY OF HEALTHCARE ETHICS. - ISSN 0963-1801. - 26:1(2017 Jan), pp. 109-119. [10.1017/S0963180116000682]

Conscientious objection, complicity in wrongdoing, and a not-so-moderate approach

F. Minerva
2017

Abstract

This article analyzes the problem of complicity in wrongdoing in the case of healthcare practitioners (and in particular Roman Catholic ones) who refuse to perform abortions, but who are nonetheless required to facilitate abortions by informing their patients about this option and by referring them to a willing colleague. Although this solution is widely supported in the literature and is also widely represented in much legislation, the argument here is that it fails to both (1) safeguard the well-being of the patients, and (2) protect the moral integrity of healthcare practitioners. Finally, the article proposes a new solution to this problem that is based on a desirable ratio of conscientious objectors to non-conscientious objectors in a hospital or in a given geographic area.
abortion; complicity; conscientious objection; cooperation in wrongdoing; abortion, induced; catholicism; female; health personnel; humans; morals; patient safety; personnel staffing and scheduling; pregnancy; referral and consultation; refusal to treat; complicity; conscience
Settore M-FIL/03 - Filosofia Morale
gen-2017
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2016CambridgeQconscientious_objection_complicity_in_wrongdoing_and_a_notsomoderate_approach.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 214.92 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
214.92 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
out.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 96.32 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
96.32 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/835188
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 5
  • Scopus 24
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 22
social impact