In 2015, the EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) issued an opinion on the safety and efficacy of ammonium formate, calcium formate and sodium formate when used as a technological additive (preservative) for all animal species. Calcium formate was considered safe for all animal species at a maximum concentration of 10,000 mg formic acid equivalents/kg complete feed (with the exception of pigs, for which a maximum concentration of 12,000 mg formic acid equivalents/kg complete feed was considered safe). Calcium formate was also considered safe for the consumer and the environment. The Panel also concluded that calcium formate is non-irritant to the skin, but mildly irritant to the eyes, and is a respiratory irritant with a potential for sensitisation. The Panel also concluded that 'Calcium formate or solid sodium formate had no discernible effects on microbial numbers in the feed materials examined. The preservative effect of the three formate salts in water for drinking was not demonstrated'. In the current opinion, additional data to demonstrate the efficacy of calcium formate as a preservative in feed for all animal species were assessed. The Panel concluded that calcium formate has the potential to be efficacious as a preservative in feedingstuffs for all animal species at the proposed use level. In the absence of data, the Panel cannot conclude on the efficacy of the use of the additive in water for drinking.

Efficacy of calcium formate as a technological feed additive (preservative) for all animal species / V. Bampidis, G. Azimonti, M. de Lourdes Bastos, H. Christensen, B. Dusemund, M. Kos Durjava, M. Kouba, M. López-Alonso, S. López Puente, F. Marcon, B. Mayo, A. Pechová, M. Petkova, F. Ramos, Y. Sanz, R.E. Villa, R. Woutersen, G. Aquilina, G. Bories, J. Gropp, C. Nebbia, M.L. Innocenti. - In: EFSA JOURNAL. - ISSN 1831-4732. - 18:4(2020 Apr), pp. e06077.1-e06077.6.

Efficacy of calcium formate as a technological feed additive (preservative) for all animal species

R.E. Villa;
2020

Abstract

In 2015, the EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) issued an opinion on the safety and efficacy of ammonium formate, calcium formate and sodium formate when used as a technological additive (preservative) for all animal species. Calcium formate was considered safe for all animal species at a maximum concentration of 10,000 mg formic acid equivalents/kg complete feed (with the exception of pigs, for which a maximum concentration of 12,000 mg formic acid equivalents/kg complete feed was considered safe). Calcium formate was also considered safe for the consumer and the environment. The Panel also concluded that calcium formate is non-irritant to the skin, but mildly irritant to the eyes, and is a respiratory irritant with a potential for sensitisation. The Panel also concluded that 'Calcium formate or solid sodium formate had no discernible effects on microbial numbers in the feed materials examined. The preservative effect of the three formate salts in water for drinking was not demonstrated'. In the current opinion, additional data to demonstrate the efficacy of calcium formate as a preservative in feed for all animal species were assessed. The Panel concluded that calcium formate has the potential to be efficacious as a preservative in feedingstuffs for all animal species at the proposed use level. In the absence of data, the Panel cannot conclude on the efficacy of the use of the additive in water for drinking.
calcium formate; efficacy; preservative; technological additive
Settore VET/07 - Farmacologia e Tossicologia Veterinaria
apr-2020
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
j.efsa.2020.6077.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 745.7 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
745.7 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/828596
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact