Primary systemic therapy is increasingly used in the treatment of patients with early-stage breast cancer, but few guidelines specifically address optimal locoregional therapies. Therefore, we established an international consortium to discuss clinical evidence and to provide expert advice on technical management of patients with early-stage breast cancer. The steering committee prepared six working packages to address all major clinical questions from diagnosis to surgery. During a consensus meeting that included members from European scientific oncology societies, clinical trial groups, and patient advocates, statements were discussed and voted on. A consensus was reached in 42% of statements, a majority in 38%, and no decision in 21%. Based on these findings, the panel developed clinical guidance recommendations and a toolbox to overcome many clinical and technical requirements associated with the diagnosis, response assessment, surgical planning, and surgery of patients with early-stage breast cancer. This guidance could convince clinicians and patients of the major clinical advancements purported by primary systemic therapy, the use of less extensive and more targeted surgery to improve the lives of patients with breast cancer.

Breast conservation and axillary management after primary systemic therapy in patients with early-stage breast cancer: the Lucerne toolbox / P. Dubsky, K. Pinker, F. Cardoso, G. Montagna, M. Ritter, C. Denkert, I.T. Rubio, E. de Azambuja, G. Curigliano, O. Gentilini, M. Gnant, A. Gunthert, N. Hauser, J. Heil, M. Knauer, M. Knotek-Roggenbauerc, S. Knox, T. Kovacs, H.M. Kuerer, S. Loibl, M. Mannhart, I. Meattini, F. Penault-Llorca, N. Radosevic-Robin, P. Sager, T. Spanic, P. Steyerova, C. Tausch, M.-.T.F.D.V. Peeters, W.P. Weber, M.J. Cardoso, P. Poortmans. - In: THE LANCET ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 1470-2045. - 22:1(2021 Jan), pp. e18-e28. [10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30580-5]

Breast conservation and axillary management after primary systemic therapy in patients with early-stage breast cancer: the Lucerne toolbox

G. Curigliano
Conceptualization
;
2021

Abstract

Primary systemic therapy is increasingly used in the treatment of patients with early-stage breast cancer, but few guidelines specifically address optimal locoregional therapies. Therefore, we established an international consortium to discuss clinical evidence and to provide expert advice on technical management of patients with early-stage breast cancer. The steering committee prepared six working packages to address all major clinical questions from diagnosis to surgery. During a consensus meeting that included members from European scientific oncology societies, clinical trial groups, and patient advocates, statements were discussed and voted on. A consensus was reached in 42% of statements, a majority in 38%, and no decision in 21%. Based on these findings, the panel developed clinical guidance recommendations and a toolbox to overcome many clinical and technical requirements associated with the diagnosis, response assessment, surgical planning, and surgery of patients with early-stage breast cancer. This guidance could convince clinicians and patients of the major clinical advancements purported by primary systemic therapy, the use of less extensive and more targeted surgery to improve the lives of patients with breast cancer.
Antineoplastic Agents; Breast Neoplasms; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Clinical Decision-Making; Consensus; Delphi Technique; Female; Humans; Mastectomy, Segmental; Medical Oncology; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Neoplasm Staging; Treatment Outcome
Settore MED/06 - Oncologia Medica
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Curigliano and Lucerne toolbox.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 249.58 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
249.58 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/824996
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 7
  • Scopus 20
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 20
social impact