Flexible bronchoscopy is a key diagnostic and therapeutic tool. New endoscopes and technologically advanced navigational modalities have been recently introduced on the market and in clinical practice, mainly for the diagnosis of mediastinal lymph adenopathies and peripheral lung nodules. Bronchoscopic sampling tools have not changed significantly in the last three decades, with the sole exception of cryobiopsy. We carried out a non-systematic, narrative literature review aimed at summarizing the scientific evidence on the main indications/contraindications, diagnostic yield, and safety of the available bronchoscopic sampling techniques. Performance of bronchoalveolar lavage, bronchial washing, brushing, forceps biopsy, cryobiopsy and needle aspiration techniques are described, focusing on indications and diagnostic accuracy in the work-up of endobronchial lesions, peripheral pulmonary abnormalities, interstitial lung diseases, and/or hilar-mediastinal lymph adenopathies. Main factors affecting the diagnostic yield and the navigational methods are evaluated. Preliminary data on the utility of the newest sampling techniques (i.e., new needles, triple cytology needle brush, core biopsy system, and cautery-assisted transbronchial forceps biopsy) are shown. Take Home Message: A deep knowledge of bronchoscopic sampling techniques is crucial in the era of technological bronchoscopy for an optimal management of respiratory diseases.

Bronchoscopic sampling techniques in the era of technological bronchoscopy / M. Mondoni, R.F. Rinaldo, P. Carlucci, S. Terraneo, L. Saderi, S. Centanni, G. Sotgiu. - In: PULMONOLOGY. - ISSN 2531-0429. - 28:6(2022 Dec), pp. 461-471. [10.1016/j.pulmoe.2020.06.007]

Bronchoscopic sampling techniques in the era of technological bronchoscopy

M. Mondoni
Primo
;
R.F. Rinaldo
Secondo
;
S. Terraneo;S. Centanni
Penultimo
;
2022

Abstract

Flexible bronchoscopy is a key diagnostic and therapeutic tool. New endoscopes and technologically advanced navigational modalities have been recently introduced on the market and in clinical practice, mainly for the diagnosis of mediastinal lymph adenopathies and peripheral lung nodules. Bronchoscopic sampling tools have not changed significantly in the last three decades, with the sole exception of cryobiopsy. We carried out a non-systematic, narrative literature review aimed at summarizing the scientific evidence on the main indications/contraindications, diagnostic yield, and safety of the available bronchoscopic sampling techniques. Performance of bronchoalveolar lavage, bronchial washing, brushing, forceps biopsy, cryobiopsy and needle aspiration techniques are described, focusing on indications and diagnostic accuracy in the work-up of endobronchial lesions, peripheral pulmonary abnormalities, interstitial lung diseases, and/or hilar-mediastinal lymph adenopathies. Main factors affecting the diagnostic yield and the navigational methods are evaluated. Preliminary data on the utility of the newest sampling techniques (i.e., new needles, triple cytology needle brush, core biopsy system, and cautery-assisted transbronchial forceps biopsy) are shown. Take Home Message: A deep knowledge of bronchoscopic sampling techniques is crucial in the era of technological bronchoscopy for an optimal management of respiratory diseases.
Biopsy techniques; Bronchoalveolar lavage; Bronchoscopy; Lung cancer; Pulmonary infections; Pulmonary nodules
Settore MED/10 - Malattie dell'Apparato Respiratorio
dic-2022
2-lug-2020
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2022 - Bronchoscopic sampling techniques in the era of technological bronchoscopy.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 612.29 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
612.29 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/822936
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 5
  • Scopus 34
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 22
social impact