Objective: To compare outcomes of minimally invasive radical nephrectomy (MIS-RN) and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) in clinical T2a renal mass (cT2aRM). Patients and Methods: Retrospective, multicentre, propensity score-matched (PSM) comparison of RAPN and MIS-RN for cT2aRM (T2aN0M0). Cohorts were PSM for age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, clinical tumour size, and R.E.N.A.L. score using a 2:1 ratio for RN:PN. The primary outcome was disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS), complication rates, and de novo estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <45 mL/min/1.73 m2. Multivariable (MVA) and Kaplan–Meier survival analyses (KMSA) were conducted. Results: In all, 648 patients (216 RAPN/432 MIS-RN) were matched. There were no significant differences in intraoperative complications (P = 0.478), Clavien–Dindo Grade ≥III complications (P = 0.063), and re-admissions (P = 0.238). The MVA revealed high ASA class (hazard ratio [HR] 2.7, P = 0.044) and sarcomatoid (HR 5.3, P = 0.001), but not surgery type (P = 0.601) to be associated with all-cause mortality. Increasing R.E.N.A.L. score (HR 1.31, P = 0.037), high tumour grade (HR 2.5, P = 0.043), and sarcomatoid (HR 2.8, P = 0.02) were associated with recurrence, but not surgery (P = 0.555). Increasing age (HR 1.1, P < 0.001) and RN (HR 3.9, P < 0.001) were predictors of de novo eGFR of <45 mL/min/1.73 m2. Comparing RAPN and MIS-RN, KMSA revealed no significant differences for 5-year OS (76.3% vs 88.0%, P = 0.221) and 5-year DFS (78.6% vs 85.3%, P = 0.630) for pT2 RCC, and no differences for 3-year OS (P = 0.351) and 3-year DFS (P = 0.117) for pT3a upstaged RCC. The 5-year freedom from de novo eGFR of <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 was 91.6% for RAPN vs 68.9% for MIS-RN (P < 0.001). Conclusions: RAPN had similar oncological outcomes and morbidity profile as MIS-RN, while conferring functional benefit. RAPN may be considered as a first-line option for cT2aRM.

Robotic partial nephrectomy vs minimally invasive radical nephrectomy for clinical T2a renal mass: a propensity score-matched comparison from the ROSULA (Robotic Surgery for Large Renal Mass) Collaborative Group / A.W. Bradshaw, R. Autorino, G. Simone, B. Yang, R.G. Uzzo, F. Porpiglia, U. Capitanio, J. Porter, R. Bertolo, A. Minervini, C. Lau, K. Jacobsohn, A. Ashrafi, D. Eun, A. Mottrie, W.M. White, L. Schips, B.J. Challacombe, O. De Cobelli, C.M. Mir, A. Veccia, A. Larcher, A. Kutikov, M. Aron, P. Dasgupta, F. Montorsi, I.S. Gill, C.P. Sundaram, J. Kaouk, I.H. Derweesh. - In: BJU INTERNATIONAL. - ISSN 1464-4096. - 126:1(2020 Jul 01), pp. 114-123. [10.1111/bju.15064]

Robotic partial nephrectomy vs minimally invasive radical nephrectomy for clinical T2a renal mass: a propensity score-matched comparison from the ROSULA (Robotic Surgery for Large Renal Mass) Collaborative Group

G. Simone;O. De Cobelli;F. Montorsi;
2020

Abstract

Objective: To compare outcomes of minimally invasive radical nephrectomy (MIS-RN) and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) in clinical T2a renal mass (cT2aRM). Patients and Methods: Retrospective, multicentre, propensity score-matched (PSM) comparison of RAPN and MIS-RN for cT2aRM (T2aN0M0). Cohorts were PSM for age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, clinical tumour size, and R.E.N.A.L. score using a 2:1 ratio for RN:PN. The primary outcome was disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS), complication rates, and de novo estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <45 mL/min/1.73 m2. Multivariable (MVA) and Kaplan–Meier survival analyses (KMSA) were conducted. Results: In all, 648 patients (216 RAPN/432 MIS-RN) were matched. There were no significant differences in intraoperative complications (P = 0.478), Clavien–Dindo Grade ≥III complications (P = 0.063), and re-admissions (P = 0.238). The MVA revealed high ASA class (hazard ratio [HR] 2.7, P = 0.044) and sarcomatoid (HR 5.3, P = 0.001), but not surgery type (P = 0.601) to be associated with all-cause mortality. Increasing R.E.N.A.L. score (HR 1.31, P = 0.037), high tumour grade (HR 2.5, P = 0.043), and sarcomatoid (HR 2.8, P = 0.02) were associated with recurrence, but not surgery (P = 0.555). Increasing age (HR 1.1, P < 0.001) and RN (HR 3.9, P < 0.001) were predictors of de novo eGFR of <45 mL/min/1.73 m2. Comparing RAPN and MIS-RN, KMSA revealed no significant differences for 5-year OS (76.3% vs 88.0%, P = 0.221) and 5-year DFS (78.6% vs 85.3%, P = 0.630) for pT2 RCC, and no differences for 3-year OS (P = 0.351) and 3-year DFS (P = 0.117) for pT3a upstaged RCC. The 5-year freedom from de novo eGFR of <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 was 91.6% for RAPN vs 68.9% for MIS-RN (P < 0.001). Conclusions: RAPN had similar oncological outcomes and morbidity profile as MIS-RN, while conferring functional benefit. RAPN may be considered as a first-line option for cT2aRM.
English
carcinoma, renal cell; chronic kidney disease; disease-free survival; nephrectomy; robot-assisted partial nephrectomy; Stage 2; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Staging; Nephrectomy; Retrospective Studies; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Treatment Outcome; Propensity Score
Settore MED/24 - Urologia
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Pubblicazione scientifica
1-lug-2020
giu-2020
Wiley Blackwell Publishing
126
1
114
123
10
Pubblicato
Periodico con rilevanza internazionale
scopus
pubmed
crossref
wos
Aderisco
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Robotic partial nephrectomy vs minimally invasive radical nephrectomy for clinical T2a renal mass: a propensity score-matched comparison from the ROSULA (Robotic Surgery for Large Renal Mass) Collaborative Group / A.W. Bradshaw, R. Autorino, G. Simone, B. Yang, R.G. Uzzo, F. Porpiglia, U. Capitanio, J. Porter, R. Bertolo, A. Minervini, C. Lau, K. Jacobsohn, A. Ashrafi, D. Eun, A. Mottrie, W.M. White, L. Schips, B.J. Challacombe, O. De Cobelli, C.M. Mir, A. Veccia, A. Larcher, A. Kutikov, M. Aron, P. Dasgupta, F. Montorsi, I.S. Gill, C.P. Sundaram, J. Kaouk, I.H. Derweesh. - In: BJU INTERNATIONAL. - ISSN 1464-4096. - 126:1(2020 Jul 01), pp. 114-123. [10.1111/bju.15064]
reserved
Prodotti della ricerca::01 - Articolo su periodico
30
262
Article (author)
no
A.W. Bradshaw, R. Autorino, G. Simone, B. Yang, R.G. Uzzo, F. Porpiglia, U. Capitanio, J. Porter, R. Bertolo, A. Minervini, C. Lau, K. Jacobsohn, A. Ashrafi, D. Eun, A. Mottrie, W.M. White, L. Schips, B.J. Challacombe, O. De Cobelli, C.M. Mir, A. Veccia, A. Larcher, A. Kutikov, M. Aron, P. Dasgupta, F. Montorsi, I.S. Gill, C.P. Sundaram, J. Kaouk, I.H. Derweesh
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Robotic partial.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 516.88 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
516.88 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/821984
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 12
  • Scopus 43
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 41
social impact