The difficulties of behavioral evaluation of prolonged disorders of consciousness (DOC) motivate the development of brain-based diagnostic approaches. The perturbational complexity index (PCI), which measures the complexity of electroencephalographic (EEG) responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), showed a remarkable sensitivity in detecting minimal signs of consciousness in previous studies. Here, we tested the reliability of PCI in an independently collected sample of 24 severely brain-injured patients, including 11 unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS), 12 minimally conscious state (MCS) patients, and 1 emergence from MCS patient. We found that the individual maximum PCI value across stimulation sites fell within the consciousness range (i.e., was higher than PCI*, which is an empirical cutoff previously validated on a benchmark population) in 11 MCS patients, yielding a sensitivity of 92% that surpassed qualitative evaluation of resting EEG. Most UWS patients (n = 7, 64%) showed a slow and stereotypical TMS-EEG response, associated with low-complexity PCI values (i.e., ≤PCI*). Four UWS patients (36%) provided high-complexity PCI values, which might suggest a covert capacity for consciousness. In conclusion, this study successfully replicated the performance of PCI in discriminating between UWS and MCS patients, further motivating the application of TMS-EEG in the workflow of DOC evaluation.

Detecting the potential for consciousness in unresponsive patients using the perturbational complexity index / D.O. Sinitsyn, A.G. Poydasheva, I.S. Bakulin, L.A. Legostaeva, E.G. Iazeva, D.V. Sergeev, A.N. Sergeeva, E.I. Kremneva, S.N. Morozova, D.Y. Lagoda, S. Casarotto, A. Comanducci, Y.V. Ryabinkina, N.A. Suponeva, M.A. Piradov. - In: BRAIN SCIENCES. - ISSN 2076-3425. - 10:12(2020 Dec), pp. 917.1-917.12. [10.3390/brainsci10120917]

Detecting the potential for consciousness in unresponsive patients using the perturbational complexity index

S. Casarotto;A. Comanducci;
2020

Abstract

The difficulties of behavioral evaluation of prolonged disorders of consciousness (DOC) motivate the development of brain-based diagnostic approaches. The perturbational complexity index (PCI), which measures the complexity of electroencephalographic (EEG) responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), showed a remarkable sensitivity in detecting minimal signs of consciousness in previous studies. Here, we tested the reliability of PCI in an independently collected sample of 24 severely brain-injured patients, including 11 unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS), 12 minimally conscious state (MCS) patients, and 1 emergence from MCS patient. We found that the individual maximum PCI value across stimulation sites fell within the consciousness range (i.e., was higher than PCI*, which is an empirical cutoff previously validated on a benchmark population) in 11 MCS patients, yielding a sensitivity of 92% that surpassed qualitative evaluation of resting EEG. Most UWS patients (n = 7, 64%) showed a slow and stereotypical TMS-EEG response, associated with low-complexity PCI values (i.e., ≤PCI*). Four UWS patients (36%) provided high-complexity PCI values, which might suggest a covert capacity for consciousness. In conclusion, this study successfully replicated the performance of PCI in discriminating between UWS and MCS patients, further motivating the application of TMS-EEG in the workflow of DOC evaluation.
Diagnosis; Disorders of consciousness; Electroencephalography; Minimally conscious state; Perturbational complexity index; Reliability; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Unresponsive wakefulness syndrome
Settore BIO/09 - Fisiologia
dic-2020
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Sinitsyn et al. - 2020 - Detecting the Potential for Consciousness in Unres.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 1.19 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.19 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/818020
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 32
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 27
social impact