Objective The aim of the study was to determine the influence of neuromuscular electrical stimulation pulse waveform and frequency on evoked torque, stimulation efficiency, and discomfort at two neuromuscular electrical stimulation levels. Design This is a repeated measures study. The quadriceps muscle of 24 healthy men was stimulated at submaximal (neuromuscular electrical stimulationsub) and maximal (neuromuscular electrical stimulationmax) levels using two pulse waveforms (symmetrical, asymmetrical) and three pulse frequencies (60, 80, 100 Hz). Repeated measures analysis of variance and effect sizes were used to verify the effect of pulse waveform and pulse frequency on stimulation efficiency (evoked torque/current intensity) and discomfort and to assess the magnitude of the differences, respectively. Results Stimulation efficiency was higher for symmetrical (neuromuscular electrical stimulationsub = 0.88 ± 0.21 Nm/mA; neuromuscular electrical stimulationmax = 1.27 ± 0.46 Nm/mA) compared with asymmetrical (neuromuscular electrical stimulationsub = 0.77 ± 0.21 Nm/mA; neuromuscular electrical stimulationmax = 1.02 ± 0.34 Nm/mA; P ≤ 0.001; effect size = 0.56-0.66) but did not significantly differ between frequencies (P = 0.17). At both neuromuscular electrical stimulation levels, there were no statistically significant differences in discomfort between pulse waveforms or frequencies. Conclusions The higher stimulation efficiency of symmetrical pulses suggests that this waveform would be preferred to asymmetrical pulses in clinical practice. Stimulation frequencies between 60 and 100 Hz can be used interchangeably because of similar efficiency and discomfort.

Influence of Pulse Waveform and Frequency on Evoked Torque, Stimulation Efficiency, and Discomfort in Healthy Subjects / R. Rabello da Silva, M. Frohlich, N.A. Maffiuletti, M.A. Vaz. - In: AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION. - ISSN 0894-9115. - 100:2(2021 Feb 01), pp. 161-167. [10.1097/PHM.0000000000001541]

Influence of Pulse Waveform and Frequency on Evoked Torque, Stimulation Efficiency, and Discomfort in Healthy Subjects

R. Rabello da Silva;
2021

Abstract

Objective The aim of the study was to determine the influence of neuromuscular electrical stimulation pulse waveform and frequency on evoked torque, stimulation efficiency, and discomfort at two neuromuscular electrical stimulation levels. Design This is a repeated measures study. The quadriceps muscle of 24 healthy men was stimulated at submaximal (neuromuscular electrical stimulationsub) and maximal (neuromuscular electrical stimulationmax) levels using two pulse waveforms (symmetrical, asymmetrical) and three pulse frequencies (60, 80, 100 Hz). Repeated measures analysis of variance and effect sizes were used to verify the effect of pulse waveform and pulse frequency on stimulation efficiency (evoked torque/current intensity) and discomfort and to assess the magnitude of the differences, respectively. Results Stimulation efficiency was higher for symmetrical (neuromuscular electrical stimulationsub = 0.88 ± 0.21 Nm/mA; neuromuscular electrical stimulationmax = 1.27 ± 0.46 Nm/mA) compared with asymmetrical (neuromuscular electrical stimulationsub = 0.77 ± 0.21 Nm/mA; neuromuscular electrical stimulationmax = 1.02 ± 0.34 Nm/mA; P ≤ 0.001; effect size = 0.56-0.66) but did not significantly differ between frequencies (P = 0.17). At both neuromuscular electrical stimulation levels, there were no statistically significant differences in discomfort between pulse waveforms or frequencies. Conclusions The higher stimulation efficiency of symmetrical pulses suggests that this waveform would be preferred to asymmetrical pulses in clinical practice. Stimulation frequencies between 60 and 100 Hz can be used interchangeably because of similar efficiency and discomfort.
Frequency; NMES; Stimulation Efficiency; Waveform
Settore MED/34 - Medicina Fisica e Riabilitativa
lug-2020
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
00002060-900000000-97921.pdf

Open Access dal 02/02/2022

Tipologia: Post-print, accepted manuscript ecc. (versione accettata dall'editore)
Dimensione 1.55 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.55 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/816907
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact