Background: In EBV-related nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), quantitative determination of circulating EBV-DNA (cEBV-DNA) can potentially be applied as disease marker. The aim of the study was to investigate if the clinical utility of cEBV-DNA is established in clinical practice guidelines and if recommendations are provided to standardize the quantitative cEBV-DNA determination. Methods: A systematic literature search for NPC guidelines published since 2011 was performed. Information for cEBV-DNA detection method and use in clinical practice was synthesized in consecutive steps of increasing simplification. Results: From 570 titles and abstracts identified by the search, 16 guidelines were included. The selected documents were further clustered as either being based on a systematic literature revision to generate recommendations (4/16) or not (12/16). cEBV-DNA was evaluated in only one guideline based on a systematic revision and in 8 guidelines without systematic revision. Half of available guidelines provide recommendation for its clinical use. Methodological issues on cEBV-DNA determination are discussed by 31% of guidelines, without providing any recommendation on method standardization. Conclusions: Due to its prognostic value, cEBV-DNA is suggested in the pre-treatment work-up and in the follow-up. Guideline producers need to take into more consideration methodological aspects impacting the actual reliability and generalizability of laboratory results.

The appropriate use of circulating EBV-DNA in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Comprehensive clinical practice guidelines evaluation / C. Trevisiol, M. Gion, A. Vaona, A.S.C. Fabricio, E. Roca, L. Licitra, S. Alfieri, P. Bossi. - In: ORAL ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 1368-8375. - 114:(2021), pp. 105128.1-105128.9. [10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.105128]

The appropriate use of circulating EBV-DNA in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Comprehensive clinical practice guidelines evaluation

E. Roca;L. Licitra;S. Alfieri;
2021

Abstract

Background: In EBV-related nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), quantitative determination of circulating EBV-DNA (cEBV-DNA) can potentially be applied as disease marker. The aim of the study was to investigate if the clinical utility of cEBV-DNA is established in clinical practice guidelines and if recommendations are provided to standardize the quantitative cEBV-DNA determination. Methods: A systematic literature search for NPC guidelines published since 2011 was performed. Information for cEBV-DNA detection method and use in clinical practice was synthesized in consecutive steps of increasing simplification. Results: From 570 titles and abstracts identified by the search, 16 guidelines were included. The selected documents were further clustered as either being based on a systematic literature revision to generate recommendations (4/16) or not (12/16). cEBV-DNA was evaluated in only one guideline based on a systematic revision and in 8 guidelines without systematic revision. Half of available guidelines provide recommendation for its clinical use. Methodological issues on cEBV-DNA determination are discussed by 31% of guidelines, without providing any recommendation on method standardization. Conclusions: Due to its prognostic value, cEBV-DNA is suggested in the pre-treatment work-up and in the follow-up. Guideline producers need to take into more consideration methodological aspects impacting the actual reliability and generalizability of laboratory results.
Circulating EBV-DNA; Epstein-Barr Virus; Nasopharyngeal carcinoma; Practice guidelines; Prognosis; Quality of health care
Settore MED/06 - Oncologia Medica
2021
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S1368837520305649-main.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 655.03 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
655.03 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/810021
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 11
social impact