The authors of this paper would like to inform the readers that there are errors in some data of the control group in the original article published on 30 April 2019. The correct percentages and correct number for the controls are reproduced below. These errors have now also been rectified in the online version. Results in abstract The last sentence should read: Patients with TBD/IMH-B presented with a significantly higher prevalence of type III arch [41.0% (107/261) (35.2-47.1)] than controls [16% (1241/7983) (10-22)]. Results in main text In the last sentence of the 3rd paragraph, the total number of control cases should be 7983 (not 7893). The last sentence of the 5th paragraph should read: No difference in terms of gender was found between the study group [male 66.7% (60.7-72.1)] and controls [male 67% (60-75)]. The last paragraph should read: The prevalence of type III arch in the study group was significantly higher [41.0% (107/261) (35.2-47.1)] than in controls [16% (1241/7983) (10-22)]. The prevalence in controls was calculated using a randomized model being the I2 97% with P-value <0.01 for heterogeneity (Fig. 3).

Corrigendum to: Prevalence of type III arch configuration in patients with type B aortic dissection (European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery (2019) DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz137) / M.M. Marrocco-Trischitta, B. Rylski, F. Schofer, F. Secchi, G. Piffaretti, H. De Beaufort, V. Belvroy, J. Bismuth, M. Czerny, S. Trimarchi. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY. - ISSN 1010-7940. - 56:6(2019 May 25), pp. 1208-1208. [10.1093/ejcts/ezz172]

Corrigendum to: Prevalence of type III arch configuration in patients with type B aortic dissection (European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery (2019) DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz137)

F. Secchi;S. Trimarchi
2019

Abstract

The authors of this paper would like to inform the readers that there are errors in some data of the control group in the original article published on 30 April 2019. The correct percentages and correct number for the controls are reproduced below. These errors have now also been rectified in the online version. Results in abstract The last sentence should read: Patients with TBD/IMH-B presented with a significantly higher prevalence of type III arch [41.0% (107/261) (35.2-47.1)] than controls [16% (1241/7983) (10-22)]. Results in main text In the last sentence of the 3rd paragraph, the total number of control cases should be 7983 (not 7893). The last sentence of the 5th paragraph should read: No difference in terms of gender was found between the study group [male 66.7% (60.7-72.1)] and controls [male 67% (60-75)]. The last paragraph should read: The prevalence of type III arch in the study group was significantly higher [41.0% (107/261) (35.2-47.1)] than in controls [16% (1241/7983) (10-22)]. The prevalence in controls was calculated using a randomized model being the I2 97% with P-value <0.01 for heterogeneity (Fig. 3).
Settore MED/36 - Diagnostica per Immagini e Radioterapia
http://hdl.handle.net/hdl:2434/660595
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
ezz172.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 57.69 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
57.69 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Caricamento pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/809347
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact