Simulation models represent soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics in global carbon (C) cycle scenarios to support climate-change studies. It is imperative to increase confidence in long-term predictions of SOC dynamics by reducing the uncertainty in model estimates. We evaluated SOC simulated from an ensemble of 26 process-based C models by comparing simulations to experimental data from seven long-term bare-fallow (vegetation-free) plots at six sites: Denmark (two sites), France, Russia, Sweden and the United Kingdom. The decay of SOC in these plots has been monitored for decades since the last inputs of plant material, providing the opportunity to test decomposition without the continuous input of new organic material. The models were run independently over multi-year simulation periods (from 28 to 80 years) in a blind test with no calibration (Bln) and with the following three calibration scenarios, each providing different levels of information and/or allowing different levels of model fitting: (a) calibrating decomposition parameters separately at each experimental site (Spe); (b) using a generic, knowledge-based, parameterization applicable in the Central European region (Gen); and (c) using a combination of both (a) and (b) strategies (Mix). We addressed uncertainties from different modelling approaches with or without spin-up initialization of SOC. Changes in the multi-model median (MMM) of SOC were used as descriptors of the ensemble performance. On average across sites, Gen proved adequate in describing changes in SOC, with MMM equal to average SOC (and standard deviation) of 39.2 (±15.5) Mg C/ha compared to the observed mean of 36.0 (±19.7) Mg C/ha (last observed year), indicating sufficiently reliable SOC estimates. Moving to Mix (37.5 ± 16.7 Mg C/ha) and Spe (36.8 ± 19.8 Mg C/ha) provided only marginal gains in accuracy, but modellers would need to apply more knowledge and a greater calibration effort than in Gen, thereby limiting the wider applicability of models.

Ensemble modelling, uncertainty and robust predictions of organic carbon in long-term bare-fallow soils / R. Farina, R. Sandor, M. Abdalla, J. Alvaro-Fuentes, L. Bechini, M.A. Bolinder, L. Brilli, C. Chenu, H. Clivot, M. De Antoni Migliorati, C. Di Bene, C.D. Dorich, F. Ehrhardt, F. Ferchaud, N. Fitton, R. Francaviglia, U. Franko, D.L. Giltrap, B.B. Grant, B. Guenet, M.T. Harrison, M.U.F. Kirschbaum, K. Kuka, L. Kulmala, J. Liski, M.J. McGrath, E. Meier, L. Menichetti, F. Moyano, C. Nendel, S. Recous, N. Reibold, A. Shepherd, W.N. Smith, P. Smith, J.-. Soussana, T. Stella, A. Taghizadeh-Toosi, E. Tsutskikh, G. Bellocchi. - In: GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY. - ISSN 1354-1013. - 27:4(2021 Feb), pp. 904-928. [10.1111/gcb.15441]

Ensemble modelling, uncertainty and robust predictions of organic carbon in long-term bare-fallow soils

L. Bechini;
2021

Abstract

Simulation models represent soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics in global carbon (C) cycle scenarios to support climate-change studies. It is imperative to increase confidence in long-term predictions of SOC dynamics by reducing the uncertainty in model estimates. We evaluated SOC simulated from an ensemble of 26 process-based C models by comparing simulations to experimental data from seven long-term bare-fallow (vegetation-free) plots at six sites: Denmark (two sites), France, Russia, Sweden and the United Kingdom. The decay of SOC in these plots has been monitored for decades since the last inputs of plant material, providing the opportunity to test decomposition without the continuous input of new organic material. The models were run independently over multi-year simulation periods (from 28 to 80 years) in a blind test with no calibration (Bln) and with the following three calibration scenarios, each providing different levels of information and/or allowing different levels of model fitting: (a) calibrating decomposition parameters separately at each experimental site (Spe); (b) using a generic, knowledge-based, parameterization applicable in the Central European region (Gen); and (c) using a combination of both (a) and (b) strategies (Mix). We addressed uncertainties from different modelling approaches with or without spin-up initialization of SOC. Changes in the multi-model median (MMM) of SOC were used as descriptors of the ensemble performance. On average across sites, Gen proved adequate in describing changes in SOC, with MMM equal to average SOC (and standard deviation) of 39.2 (±15.5) Mg C/ha compared to the observed mean of 36.0 (±19.7) Mg C/ha (last observed year), indicating sufficiently reliable SOC estimates. Moving to Mix (37.5 ± 16.7 Mg C/ha) and Spe (36.8 ± 19.8 Mg C/ha) provided only marginal gains in accuracy, but modellers would need to apply more knowledge and a greater calibration effort than in Gen, thereby limiting the wider applicability of models.
English
bare-fallow soils; model parametrization; process-based models; protocol for model comparison; soil organic carbon dynamics
Settore AGR/02 - Agronomia e Coltivazioni Erbacee
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Ricerca applicata
Pubblicazione scientifica
   C and N Models Intercomparison and Improvement to assess management options for GHG mitigation in agrosystems worldwide
   CN-MIP
   MINISTERO DELLE POLITICHE AGRICOLE ALIMENTARI, FORESTALI E DEL TURISMO
feb-2021
24-nov-2020
Wiley
27
4
904
928
25
Pubblicato
Periodico con rilevanza internazionale
scopus
pubmed
datacite
crossref
Aderisco
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Ensemble modelling, uncertainty and robust predictions of organic carbon in long-term bare-fallow soils / R. Farina, R. Sandor, M. Abdalla, J. Alvaro-Fuentes, L. Bechini, M.A. Bolinder, L. Brilli, C. Chenu, H. Clivot, M. De Antoni Migliorati, C. Di Bene, C.D. Dorich, F. Ehrhardt, F. Ferchaud, N. Fitton, R. Francaviglia, U. Franko, D.L. Giltrap, B.B. Grant, B. Guenet, M.T. Harrison, M.U.F. Kirschbaum, K. Kuka, L. Kulmala, J. Liski, M.J. McGrath, E. Meier, L. Menichetti, F. Moyano, C. Nendel, S. Recous, N. Reibold, A. Shepherd, W.N. Smith, P. Smith, J.-. Soussana, T. Stella, A. Taghizadeh-Toosi, E. Tsutskikh, G. Bellocchi. - In: GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY. - ISSN 1354-1013. - 27:4(2021 Feb), pp. 904-928. [10.1111/gcb.15441]
partially_open
Prodotti della ricerca::01 - Articolo su periodico
40
262
Article (author)
no
R. Farina, R. Sandor, M. Abdalla, J. Alvaro-Fuentes, L. Bechini, M.A. Bolinder, L. Brilli, C. Chenu, H. Clivot, M. De Antoni Migliorati, C. Di Bene, C...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
GCB-20-1834_Proof_fl.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Pre-print (manoscritto inviato all'editore)
Dimensione 3.08 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.08 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
gcb.15441.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 3.21 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.21 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/809186
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 5
  • Scopus 55
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 55
social impact