Scholarly journals are often blamed for a gender gap in publication rates, but it is unclear whether peer review and editorial processes contribute to it. This article examines gender bias in peer review with data for 145 journals in various fields of research, including about 1.7 million authors and 740,000 referees. We reconstructed three possible sources of bias, i.e., the editorial selection of referees, referee recommendations, and editorial decisions, and examined all their possible relationships. Results showed that manuscripts written by women as solo authors or coauthored by women were treated even more favorably by referees and editors. Although there were some differences between fields of research, our findings suggest that peer review and editorial processes do not penalize manuscripts by women. However, increasing gender diversity in editorial teams and referee pools could help journals inform potential authors about their attention to these factors and so stimulate participation by women.

Peer review and gender bias : a study on 145 scholarly journals / F. Squazzoni, G. Bravo, M. Farjam, A. Marusic, B. Mehmani, M. Willis, A. Birukou, P. Dondio, F. Grimaldo. - In: SCIENCE ADVANCES. - ISSN 2375-2548. - 7:2(2021 Jan 06), pp. eabd0299.1-eabd0299.12. [10.1126/sciadv.abd0299]

Peer review and gender bias : a study on 145 scholarly journals

F. Squazzoni
Primo
;
2021

Abstract

Scholarly journals are often blamed for a gender gap in publication rates, but it is unclear whether peer review and editorial processes contribute to it. This article examines gender bias in peer review with data for 145 journals in various fields of research, including about 1.7 million authors and 740,000 referees. We reconstructed three possible sources of bias, i.e., the editorial selection of referees, referee recommendations, and editorial decisions, and examined all their possible relationships. Results showed that manuscripts written by women as solo authors or coauthored by women were treated even more favorably by referees and editors. Although there were some differences between fields of research, our findings suggest that peer review and editorial processes do not penalize manuscripts by women. However, increasing gender diversity in editorial teams and referee pools could help journals inform potential authors about their attention to these factors and so stimulate participation by women.
peer review; gender bias; scholarly journals; editors; referees
Settore SPS/07 - Sociologia Generale
6-gen-2021
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
SquazzoniEtAlScienceAdvances2021GenderBiasPeerReview.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Articolo
Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 882.02 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
882.02 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/808163
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 26
  • Scopus 102
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 95
social impact