There are approximately 5 million horses in Europe (FAOSTAT, 2018): thanks to their adaptability they can be raised for several reasons, ranging from companionship to leisure and sport activities, and even food production. This aspect greatly influences their management, their relationship with humans, their behaviour and, thus, their welfare. Horses are large prey animals for which domestication has dampened, but not extinguished, innate biological flight responses (Brubaker and Udell, 2016). For this reason, several stimuli can be perceived as dangerous, inducing a flight reaction, thus playing an important role in the development of problematic behaviours (e.g. aggression, fear, phobias). Many behaviour problems in horses are associated with confinement in single boxes, the most common housing system in different Countries (Hotchkiss, Reid and Christley, 2007; Visser et al., 2014; Hockenhull and Creighton, 2015; Larsson and Müller, 2018). Indeed, confinement prevents horses from satisfying highly motivated behaviours such as free movement and social interactions with conspecifics (Dalla Costa et al., 2016). Another important issue concerns pain assessment: it is reported that lameness and back pain are the most common problems in horse athletes with an estimated prevalence varying from 27% to 100% of “healthy” ridden horse population (Landman et al., 2004; Fonseca et al., 2006; Visser et al., 2014). Although in the past decade the scientific research in horse pain assessment has increased and many different tools were developed (Dalla Costa et al., 2014; van Loon et al., 2014; Gleerup et al., 2015), a reliable pain recognition is still difficult. Especially for horse owners pain recognition is still very difficult, as no gold standard is available. Therefore, horses often continue to be used in athletic activities despite the discomfort/pain felt. Pain condition affects the development of behavioural problems, such as escape attempts and aggressions, that are very dangerous for both the horses and the riders. On the other hand, the reduced sport performance could lead to the use of “too-severe” training aids causing other pain and worsen the problem (Hockenhull and Creighton, 2012). A review of the recent scientific studies, emphasising the link between horse management, behaviour and welfare will be presented, highlighting the conceptual and methodological issues scientists have faced, as well as discussing the advantages and future challenges in equine science.

Improving horse welfare and behaviour : recent advances and open challenges in equine science / E. Dalla Costa. ((Intervento presentato al convegno ECAWBM–BM - Virtual Conference tenutosi a online nel 2020.

Improving horse welfare and behaviour : recent advances and open challenges in equine science

E. Dalla Costa
2020

Abstract

There are approximately 5 million horses in Europe (FAOSTAT, 2018): thanks to their adaptability they can be raised for several reasons, ranging from companionship to leisure and sport activities, and even food production. This aspect greatly influences their management, their relationship with humans, their behaviour and, thus, their welfare. Horses are large prey animals for which domestication has dampened, but not extinguished, innate biological flight responses (Brubaker and Udell, 2016). For this reason, several stimuli can be perceived as dangerous, inducing a flight reaction, thus playing an important role in the development of problematic behaviours (e.g. aggression, fear, phobias). Many behaviour problems in horses are associated with confinement in single boxes, the most common housing system in different Countries (Hotchkiss, Reid and Christley, 2007; Visser et al., 2014; Hockenhull and Creighton, 2015; Larsson and Müller, 2018). Indeed, confinement prevents horses from satisfying highly motivated behaviours such as free movement and social interactions with conspecifics (Dalla Costa et al., 2016). Another important issue concerns pain assessment: it is reported that lameness and back pain are the most common problems in horse athletes with an estimated prevalence varying from 27% to 100% of “healthy” ridden horse population (Landman et al., 2004; Fonseca et al., 2006; Visser et al., 2014). Although in the past decade the scientific research in horse pain assessment has increased and many different tools were developed (Dalla Costa et al., 2014; van Loon et al., 2014; Gleerup et al., 2015), a reliable pain recognition is still difficult. Especially for horse owners pain recognition is still very difficult, as no gold standard is available. Therefore, horses often continue to be used in athletic activities despite the discomfort/pain felt. Pain condition affects the development of behavioural problems, such as escape attempts and aggressions, that are very dangerous for both the horses and the riders. On the other hand, the reduced sport performance could lead to the use of “too-severe” training aids causing other pain and worsen the problem (Hockenhull and Creighton, 2012). A review of the recent scientific studies, emphasising the link between horse management, behaviour and welfare will be presented, highlighting the conceptual and methodological issues scientists have faced, as well as discussing the advantages and future challenges in equine science.
10-dic-2020
Settore AGR/19 - Zootecnica Speciale
European College of Animal Welfare and Behavioural Medicine
Improving horse welfare and behaviour : recent advances and open challenges in equine science / E. Dalla Costa. ((Intervento presentato al convegno ECAWBM–BM - Virtual Conference tenutosi a online nel 2020.
Conference Object
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
ECAWBM2020_DallaCosta.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Post-print, accepted manuscript ecc. (versione accettata dall'editore)
Dimensione 79.74 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
79.74 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/803182
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact