Transcription challenges the integrity of replicating chromosomes by generating topological stress and conflicts with forks1,2. The DNA topoisomerases Top1 and Top2 and the HMGB family protein Hmo1 assist DNA replication and transcription3–6. Here we describe the topological architecture of genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae during the G1 and S phases of the cell cycle. We found under-wound DNA at gene boundaries and over-wound DNA within coding regions. This arrangement does not depend on Pol II or S phase. Top2 and Hmo1 preserve negative supercoil at gene boundaries, while Top1 acts at coding regions. Transcription generates RNA–DNA hybrids within coding regions, independently of fork orientation. During S phase, Hmo1 protects under-wound DNA from Top2, while Top2 confines Pol II and Top1 at coding units, counteracting transcription leakage and aberrant hybrids at gene boundaries. Negative supercoil at gene boundaries prevents supercoil diffusion and nucleosome repositioning at coding regions. DNA looping occurs at Top2 clusters. We propose that Hmo1 locks gene boundaries in a cruciform conformation and, with Top2, modulates the architecture of genes that retain the memory of the topological arrangements even when transcription is repressed.

Negative supercoil at gene boundaries modulates gene topology / Y.J. Achar, M. Adhil, R. Choudhary, N. Gilbert, M. Foiani. - In: NATURE. - ISSN 0028-0836. - 577:7792(2020 Jan 30), pp. 701-705. [10.1038/s41586-020-1934-4]

Negative supercoil at gene boundaries modulates gene topology

R. Choudhary;M. Foiani
Ultimo
2020

Abstract

Transcription challenges the integrity of replicating chromosomes by generating topological stress and conflicts with forks1,2. The DNA topoisomerases Top1 and Top2 and the HMGB family protein Hmo1 assist DNA replication and transcription3–6. Here we describe the topological architecture of genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae during the G1 and S phases of the cell cycle. We found under-wound DNA at gene boundaries and over-wound DNA within coding regions. This arrangement does not depend on Pol II or S phase. Top2 and Hmo1 preserve negative supercoil at gene boundaries, while Top1 acts at coding regions. Transcription generates RNA–DNA hybrids within coding regions, independently of fork orientation. During S phase, Hmo1 protects under-wound DNA from Top2, while Top2 confines Pol II and Top1 at coding units, counteracting transcription leakage and aberrant hybrids at gene boundaries. Negative supercoil at gene boundaries prevents supercoil diffusion and nucleosome repositioning at coding regions. DNA looping occurs at Top2 clusters. We propose that Hmo1 locks gene boundaries in a cruciform conformation and, with Top2, modulates the architecture of genes that retain the memory of the topological arrangements even when transcription is repressed.
Chromatin Assembly and Disassembly; DNA Replication; DNA Topoisomerases, Type I; DNA Topoisomerases, Type II; DNA, Cruciform; DNA, Fungal; DNA, Superhelical; G1 Phase; Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal; High Mobility Group Proteins; Mutation; Nucleic Acid Hybridization; Nucleosomes; Open Reading Frames; RNA Polymerase II; RNA, Fungal; S Phase; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins; Transcription, Genetic; Genes, Fungal
Settore BIO/11 - Biologia Molecolare
Settore BIOS-08/A - Biologia molecolare
30-gen-2020
22-gen-2020
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
s41586-020-1934-4_compressed.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 1.54 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.54 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Negative_supercoil_at_gene_boundaries_modulates_gene_topology.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Post-print, accepted manuscript ecc. (versione accettata dall'editore)
Dimensione 6.67 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
6.67 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/801567
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 15
  • Scopus 46
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 46
social impact