Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic caused an increased mortality in nursing homes due to its quickspreadand the age-related high lethality.Results: We observed a two-month mortality of 40%, compared to 6.4% in the previous year. This increasewasseen in both COVID-19 positive (43%) and negative (24%) residents, but 8 patients among thosetestingnegative on the swab, tested positive on serological tests. Increased mortality was associated withmalegender, older age, no previous vitamin D supplementation and worse “activities of daily living (ADL)”scores,such as Barthel index, Tinetti scale and S.OS.I.A. classification.Conclusion: Our data confirms a higher geriatric mortality due to COVID-19. Negative residents also had highermortality, which we suspect is secondary to preanalytical error and a low sensitivity of the swab test in poorlycompliant subjects. Male gender, older age and low scores on ADL scales (probably due to immobility) areriskfactors for COVID-19 related mortality. Finally, mortality was inversely associated with vitaminDsupplementation.Design: In this observational study, we described the two-month mortality among the 157 residents (age 60-100) of a nursing home after Sars-CoV-2 spreading, reporting the factors associated with the outcome. Wealsocompared the diagnostic tests for Sars-CoV-2.

Mortality in an italian nursing home during COVID-19 pandemic: correlation with gender, age, ADL, vitamin D supplementation, and limitations of the diagnostic tests / B. Cangiano, L.M. Fatti, L. Danesi, G. Gazzano, M. Croci, G. Vitale, L. Gilardini, S. Bonadonna, I. Chiodini, C.F. Caparello, A. Conti, L. Persani, M. Stramba-Badiale, M. Bonomi. - In: AGING. - ISSN 1945-4589. - 12:24(2020 Dec 22), pp. 24522-24534. [10.18632/aging.202307]

Mortality in an italian nursing home during COVID-19 pandemic: correlation with gender, age, ADL, vitamin D supplementation, and limitations of the diagnostic tests

B. Cangiano
Co-primo
;
G. Vitale;I. Chiodini;L. Persani;M. Bonomi
Ultimo
2020

Abstract

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic caused an increased mortality in nursing homes due to its quickspreadand the age-related high lethality.Results: We observed a two-month mortality of 40%, compared to 6.4% in the previous year. This increasewasseen in both COVID-19 positive (43%) and negative (24%) residents, but 8 patients among thosetestingnegative on the swab, tested positive on serological tests. Increased mortality was associated withmalegender, older age, no previous vitamin D supplementation and worse “activities of daily living (ADL)”scores,such as Barthel index, Tinetti scale and S.OS.I.A. classification.Conclusion: Our data confirms a higher geriatric mortality due to COVID-19. Negative residents also had highermortality, which we suspect is secondary to preanalytical error and a low sensitivity of the swab test in poorlycompliant subjects. Male gender, older age and low scores on ADL scales (probably due to immobility) areriskfactors for COVID-19 related mortality. Finally, mortality was inversely associated with vitaminDsupplementation.Design: In this observational study, we described the two-month mortality among the 157 residents (age 60-100) of a nursing home after Sars-CoV-2 spreading, reporting the factors associated with the outcome. Wealsocompared the diagnostic tests for Sars-CoV-2.
hydroxychloroquine, serology, nasopharyngeal swab, sensitivity and specificity, activities of daily living, COVID-19
Settore MED/13 - Endocrinologia
Settore MED/09 - Medicina Interna
22-dic-2020
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Cangiano_B_Aging2020.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 601.28 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
601.28 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/800689
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 51
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 53
social impact