While transforming the world, globalization processes have put social sciences under stress. Several voices, notably from the so-called ‘Global South’, claim a radical revision – if not total rejection – of the (Western) social sciences. It has become evident that the tool-kit of concepts and methods inherited from modernity seems incapable of grasping the complexity and variability of both current social experience and ways of getting to know the world, actually shaped by a plurality of voices, interest, historical traditions. The awareness of a plurality of different perspectives that characterize the social sciences well beyond their classical-western formulation is creating a field that seems to push social sciences themselves towards two opposed directions. The paper offers a way to navigate through this field. On the one hand, part of this field tries to regain the solid ground of one shared scientific knowledge, overcoming diversity and particularity, running after a rigorous definition of methodological and conceptual tools that can help to found a renewed universalistic comprehension of the complexity of current societies. On the other hand, another relevant part of social sciences seems to surrender to the unavoidability of partial, instable and biased knowledge. The field created by these two parts raises the question of whether the distance between them is really unbridgeable, and yet the question is becoming the subject of considerable, often conflicting, scholarship. Besides illustrating the rationale of the different positions, we argue that integrating the current scholarships about the ‘theoretical and methodological’ content of social sciences may be possible only with a critical reflection about the actual ‘practices’ of doing social sciences.

Há passos a tornar as ciências sociais globais? O campo, as propostas e as práticas = Are there steps to making social sciences global? : the field, proposals and practices / E. Colombo, G. Navarini. - In: DIÁLOGOS POSSÍVEIS. - ISSN 2447-9047. - 19:1(2020), pp. 54-82.

Há passos a tornar as ciências sociais globais? O campo, as propostas e as práticas = Are there steps to making social sciences global? : the field, proposals and practices

E. Colombo;
2020

Abstract

While transforming the world, globalization processes have put social sciences under stress. Several voices, notably from the so-called ‘Global South’, claim a radical revision – if not total rejection – of the (Western) social sciences. It has become evident that the tool-kit of concepts and methods inherited from modernity seems incapable of grasping the complexity and variability of both current social experience and ways of getting to know the world, actually shaped by a plurality of voices, interest, historical traditions. The awareness of a plurality of different perspectives that characterize the social sciences well beyond their classical-western formulation is creating a field that seems to push social sciences themselves towards two opposed directions. The paper offers a way to navigate through this field. On the one hand, part of this field tries to regain the solid ground of one shared scientific knowledge, overcoming diversity and particularity, running after a rigorous definition of methodological and conceptual tools that can help to found a renewed universalistic comprehension of the complexity of current societies. On the other hand, another relevant part of social sciences seems to surrender to the unavoidability of partial, instable and biased knowledge. The field created by these two parts raises the question of whether the distance between them is really unbridgeable, and yet the question is becoming the subject of considerable, often conflicting, scholarship. Besides illustrating the rationale of the different positions, we argue that integrating the current scholarships about the ‘theoretical and methodological’ content of social sciences may be possible only with a critical reflection about the actual ‘practices’ of doing social sciences.
Ao transformar o mundo, os processos de globalização colocaram as ciências sociais sob stress. Várias vozes, principalmente do chamado 'Sul', reivindicam uma revisão radical – quando não uma rejeição total - das ciências sociais (ocidentais). Tornou-se evidente que o conjunto de ferramentas, de conceitos e métodos herdados da modernidade parece incapaz de compreender a complexidade e a variedade das experiências sociais atuais e das formas de conhecer o mundo, moldadas por uma pluralidade de vozes, interesses e tradições históricas. A tomada de consciência da pluralidade de perspetivas diferentes que caracterizam as ciências sociais para lá da sua formulação clássico-ocidental está a criar um campo que parece dividir as próprias ciências sociais em duas direções opostas. Este capítulo propõe uma forma de navegar por esse campo. Por um lado, parte desse campo tenta recuperar a base sólida de um conhecimento científico compartilhado, superando a diversidade e a particularidade, seguindo uma definição rigorosa de ferramentas metodológicas e conceituais que podem ajudar a fundar uma compreensão universalista renovada da complexidade das sociedades atuais. Por outro lado, outra parte relevante das ciências sociais parece render-se à inevitabilidade do conhecimento parcial, instável e tendencioso. O campo criado por essas duas partes levanta a questão de saber se a diferença entre elas é realmente intransponível. A questão está a tornar-se alvo de um campo de estudos considerável e frequentemente conflituantes. Além de ilustrar a lógica das diferentes posições, argumentamos que a integração dos atuais estudos académicos sobre o conteúdo "teórico e metodológico" das ciências sociais só pode ser possível através de uma reflexão crítica sobre as "práticas" reais de fazer ciências sociais.
Social theory; Globalization; Complexity; Postcolonialism; Universalism; Relativism
Settore SPS/08 - Sociologia dei Processi Culturali e Comunicativi
2020
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Ha passos a tornar as ciencias sociais globais. O campo, as propostas e as práticas Revista Diálogos Possíveis.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 393.57 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
393.57 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/798570
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact