Objective: The aim of this prospective study was to compare the cardiovascular risk (CVR) profile in patients treated with 2 different immunosuppressive regimens: tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (TAC) compared with everolimus and low-dose cyclosporine (EVL). Patients and Methods: Sixty consecutive renal transplant recipients prospectively assigned to TAC (n = 30) or to EVL (n = 30) were followed for 6 months. TAC group immunosuppression consisted of basiliximab, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and steroid. EVL group immunosuppression consisted of basiliximab, everolimus, and low doses of cyclosporine and steroid. Main CVR factors analyzed were: hypertension, dyslipidemia, posttransplant diabetes mellitus, and weight gain. Results: Six months posttransplantation, patients in the EVL group showed significantly higher mean serum cholesterol (P < .003) and serum triglyceride levels (P < .027), as well as a greater number of patients were receiving statin treatment (P < .05). Mean systolic blood pressure, mean diastolic blood pressure, number of patients treated for hypertension, number of antihypertensive medications prescribed per patient, posttransplant weight gain, and posttransplant diabetes mellitus were not significantly different among the EVL and TAC groups after 1, 3, and 6 months posttransplantation. Conclusions: This study showed that at 6 months posttransplantation, patients on EVL displayed significantly greater dyslipidemia with respect to the TAC group. A longer follow-up will be necessary to discover whether the presence of everolimus in the immunosuppressive regimen provides significant benefits for the CVR of renal transplant recipients.

Cardiovascular Risk Profile in Kidney Transplant Recipients Treated With Two Immunosuppressive Regimens: Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil Versus Everolimus and Low-Dose Cyclosporine / G. Spagnoletti, F. Citterio, E. Favi, E. Rossi, F. Delreno, I. De Santis, M.P. Salerno, A. Gargiulo, M. Castagneto. - In: TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS. - ISSN 0041-1345. - 41:4(2009), pp. 1175-1177. ((Intervento presentato al 32. convegno Congress of the Italian-Transplantation-Society tenutosi a Sorrento nel 2008 [10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.03.045].

Cardiovascular Risk Profile in Kidney Transplant Recipients Treated With Two Immunosuppressive Regimens: Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil Versus Everolimus and Low-Dose Cyclosporine

E. Favi;
2009

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this prospective study was to compare the cardiovascular risk (CVR) profile in patients treated with 2 different immunosuppressive regimens: tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (TAC) compared with everolimus and low-dose cyclosporine (EVL). Patients and Methods: Sixty consecutive renal transplant recipients prospectively assigned to TAC (n = 30) or to EVL (n = 30) were followed for 6 months. TAC group immunosuppression consisted of basiliximab, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and steroid. EVL group immunosuppression consisted of basiliximab, everolimus, and low doses of cyclosporine and steroid. Main CVR factors analyzed were: hypertension, dyslipidemia, posttransplant diabetes mellitus, and weight gain. Results: Six months posttransplantation, patients in the EVL group showed significantly higher mean serum cholesterol (P < .003) and serum triglyceride levels (P < .027), as well as a greater number of patients were receiving statin treatment (P < .05). Mean systolic blood pressure, mean diastolic blood pressure, number of patients treated for hypertension, number of antihypertensive medications prescribed per patient, posttransplant weight gain, and posttransplant diabetes mellitus were not significantly different among the EVL and TAC groups after 1, 3, and 6 months posttransplantation. Conclusions: This study showed that at 6 months posttransplantation, patients on EVL displayed significantly greater dyslipidemia with respect to the TAC group. A longer follow-up will be necessary to discover whether the presence of everolimus in the immunosuppressive regimen provides significant benefits for the CVR of renal transplant recipients.
allograft-rejection; efficacy
Settore MED/18 - Chirurgia Generale
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S004113450900476X-main.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 103.5 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
103.5 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Caricamento pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/792989
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 11
social impact