Parenchymal sparing procedures are gaining interest in pancreatic surgery and recent studies have reported that minimally invasive pancreatic enucleation may be associated with enhanced outcomes when compared with traditional surgery. By meta-analyzing the available data from the literature, minimally invasive surgery is not at higher risk of pancreatic fistula and offers a number of advantages over conventional surgery for pancreatic enucleation.
Minimally invasive versus open pancreatic enucleation. Systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical outcomes / F. Guerra, G. Giuliani, L. Bencini, P. Bianchi, A. Coratti. - In: JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 0022-4790. - 117:7(2018), pp. 1509-1516. [10.1002/jso.25026]
Minimally invasive versus open pancreatic enucleation. Systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical outcomes
P. Bianchi;
2018
Abstract
Parenchymal sparing procedures are gaining interest in pancreatic surgery and recent studies have reported that minimally invasive pancreatic enucleation may be associated with enhanced outcomes when compared with traditional surgery. By meta-analyzing the available data from the literature, minimally invasive surgery is not at higher risk of pancreatic fistula and offers a number of advantages over conventional surgery for pancreatic enucleation.
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
90 JSO 2018.pdf
accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione
838.7 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
838.7 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
|
jso.25026.pdf
accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione
839.24 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
839.24 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
