In (macro)economics literature, the need to consider sustainability and intertemporal equity issues leads to propose different criteria (discounted utilitarianism, green golden rule, Chichilnisky criterion) in order to define social welfare. We compare and assess the outcomes associated to such alternative criteria in a simple macroeconomic model with natural resources and environmental concern (Chichilnisky et al. in Econ Lett 49:174–179, 1995), by relying on a multicriteria approach. We show that among these three criteria, the green golden rule (discounted utilitarianism) yields the highest (lowest) welfare level, while the Chichilnisky criterion leads to an intermediate welfare level which turns out to be increasing in the weight attached to the asymptotic utility. These results suggest that completely neglecting finite-time utilities and focusing only on the asymptotic utility is not only more sensible from a sustainability point of view but also from a social welfare maximization standpoint.

Sustainability and intertemporal equity : a multicriteria approach / C. Colapinto, D. Liuzzi, S. Marsiglio. - In: ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH. - ISSN 0254-5330. - 251:1-2(2017), pp. 271-284. [10.1007/s10479-015-1837-1]

Sustainability and intertemporal equity : a multicriteria approach

C. Colapinto;D. Liuzzi;S. Marsiglio
2017

Abstract

In (macro)economics literature, the need to consider sustainability and intertemporal equity issues leads to propose different criteria (discounted utilitarianism, green golden rule, Chichilnisky criterion) in order to define social welfare. We compare and assess the outcomes associated to such alternative criteria in a simple macroeconomic model with natural resources and environmental concern (Chichilnisky et al. in Econ Lett 49:174–179, 1995), by relying on a multicriteria approach. We show that among these three criteria, the green golden rule (discounted utilitarianism) yields the highest (lowest) welfare level, while the Chichilnisky criterion leads to an intermediate welfare level which turns out to be increasing in the weight attached to the asymptotic utility. These results suggest that completely neglecting finite-time utilities and focusing only on the asymptotic utility is not only more sensible from a sustainability point of view but also from a social welfare maximization standpoint.
Intertemporal equity; Multicriteria; Social welfare; Sustainability
Settore SECS-S/06 - Metodi mat. dell'economia e Scienze Attuariali e Finanziarie
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Sustainability and Intertemporal Equity a Multicriteria Approach.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 820.8 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
820.8 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
sustainability.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Pre-print (manoscritto inviato all'editore)
Dimensione 302.48 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
302.48 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/788077
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 15
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 12
social impact