This article analyses party strategies during the campaign for the Dutch general election of March 2017, making use of issue-yield theory. It investigates whether parties strategically emphasise high-yield issues, by juxtaposing the issue opportunities provided by voters with parties’ issue emphasis during the campaign. More specifically, it asks whether parties strategically emphasised issues that were expected to reward them electorally. Analysing voter preferences and party campaign data, it is found that parties and most of their constituencies show high ideological consistency, that parties emphasise mostly positional issues and thus choose a conflict-mobilising strategy, and that most parties emphasise high-yield issues rather than following the general political agenda. Four small parties that won significantly behaved strategically while the social democrats–who severely lost–hardly did. The findings imply that the issue-yield framework can help to explain the election result in the fragmented Dutch multi-party context.
Small winners and big losers: strategic party behaviour in the 2017 Dutch general election / M.M. van Ditmars, N. Maggini, J. van Spanje. - In: WEST EUROPEAN POLITICS. - ISSN 0140-2382. - 43:3(2020), pp. 543-564. [10.1080/01402382.2019.1655959]
Small winners and big losers: strategic party behaviour in the 2017 Dutch general election
N. Maggini;
2020
Abstract
This article analyses party strategies during the campaign for the Dutch general election of March 2017, making use of issue-yield theory. It investigates whether parties strategically emphasise high-yield issues, by juxtaposing the issue opportunities provided by voters with parties’ issue emphasis during the campaign. More specifically, it asks whether parties strategically emphasised issues that were expected to reward them electorally. Analysing voter preferences and party campaign data, it is found that parties and most of their constituencies show high ideological consistency, that parties emphasise mostly positional issues and thus choose a conflict-mobilising strategy, and that most parties emphasise high-yield issues rather than following the general political agenda. Four small parties that won significantly behaved strategically while the social democrats–who severely lost–hardly did. The findings imply that the issue-yield framework can help to explain the election result in the fragmented Dutch multi-party context.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Small Winners and Big Losers. Strategic Party Behaviour in the 2017 Dutch General Election_Accepted version.pdf
accesso riservato
Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia:
Post-print, accepted manuscript ecc. (versione accettata dall'editore)
Dimensione
462.07 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
462.07 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Small winners and big losers strategic party behaviour in the 2017 Dutch general election.pdf
accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione
1.97 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.97 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.