This paper focuses on the Italian reception of Heinrich Wölfflin's "Kunstgeschichtliche Grundbegriffe". It deals with Benedetto Croce’s critical discussion of the so-called reine Sichtbarkeit (von Marées, Hildebrand, Fiedler) and of Wölfflin’s formalism. Croce’s aesthetical doctrine offered the theoretical background to a generation of influential Italian art historians including Lionello Venturi, Roberto Longhi, and Carlo Ludovico Ragghianti. His approach to the German-speaking formalistic Kunstwissenschaft constituted a sort of filter through which Wölfflin’s ideas were received and debated. I will then take into consideration a group of Italian art historians (such as Matteo Marangoni, Giulio Carlo Argan, Cesare Brandi) who, adopting for different reasons a critical stance towards Croce’s idealism, addressed Wölfflin’s formalism in their works. Finally, I will try to map the presence of Wölfflin’s Grundbegriffe in more recent trends in art historiography and art theory, including the semiological (Omar Calabrese) and aesthetological (Renato Barilli) approaches.

Who Is Afraid of Wölfflin’s Schemas? The Impact of Kunstgeschichtliche Grundbegriffe on Italian Art Historiography and Aesthetics / A. Pinotti - In: The Global Reception of Heinrich Wölfflin’s : Principles of Art History / [a cura di] E. Levy, T. Weddigen. - Prima edizione. - New Haven (CT) and London : Yale University Press, 2020. - ISBN 9780300250473. - pp. 215-232 (( convegno The Global Reception of Heinrich Wölfflin’s “Principles of Art History” (1915 – 2015) tenutosi a Washington nel 2015.

Who Is Afraid of Wölfflin’s Schemas? The Impact of Kunstgeschichtliche Grundbegriffe on Italian Art Historiography and Aesthetics

A. Pinotti
2020

Abstract

This paper focuses on the Italian reception of Heinrich Wölfflin's "Kunstgeschichtliche Grundbegriffe". It deals with Benedetto Croce’s critical discussion of the so-called reine Sichtbarkeit (von Marées, Hildebrand, Fiedler) and of Wölfflin’s formalism. Croce’s aesthetical doctrine offered the theoretical background to a generation of influential Italian art historians including Lionello Venturi, Roberto Longhi, and Carlo Ludovico Ragghianti. His approach to the German-speaking formalistic Kunstwissenschaft constituted a sort of filter through which Wölfflin’s ideas were received and debated. I will then take into consideration a group of Italian art historians (such as Matteo Marangoni, Giulio Carlo Argan, Cesare Brandi) who, adopting for different reasons a critical stance towards Croce’s idealism, addressed Wölfflin’s formalism in their works. Finally, I will try to map the presence of Wölfflin’s Grundbegriffe in more recent trends in art historiography and art theory, including the semiological (Omar Calabrese) and aesthetological (Renato Barilli) approaches.
Heinrich Wölfflin; pure visibility; reine Sichtbarkeit; Benedetto Croce; Kunstwissenschaft
Settore M-FIL/04 - Estetica
Settore L-ART/04 - Museologia e Critica Artistica e del Restauro
   Dipartimenti di Eccellenza 2018-2022 - Dipartimento di FILOSOFIA
   MINISTERO DELL'ISTRUZIONE E DEL MERITO
2020
National Gallery of Art, CASVA - Center for Advanced Study in the Visual Arts
Book Part (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2020-PINOTTI-Wölfflin's Schemas_CASVA.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 3.07 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.07 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/757718
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact