Introduction We aim to assess gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in patients treated for congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) and to determine whether a pH-metry investigation should be routinely performed in follow-up. Materials and Methods Twenty-four-hour pH-metry at 1 year was performed in all patients treated for CDH between January 2014 and April 2015 (Group 1). We compared pH-metry results to those of two other groups: children treated for esophageal atresia (EA) (Group 2) and normal babies presenting with typical symptoms (Group 3). All the pH-metric findings were analyzed and compared. Intra-group analysis was performed in Group 1. Results Group 1 consisted of 21, Group 2 of 24, and Group 3 of 21 patients. Mean pH-metry values for Groups 1, 2, and 3 were, respectively: reflux index (RI) 4.3, 5.1, and 3.9; total number of refluxes (NR) 79.5, 88.8, and 88.7; refluxes longer than 5′ (R > 5) 1.7, 2.3, and 1.47; and longest reflux episode (LR) 11.4, 13.3, and 8.6. No significant differences were found between Group 1 and the others. Only two CDH patients presented with GER-related symptoms. Patch was associated with significantly higher RI (8.5 vs. 2.98, p = 0.03). The worse was the defect, the worse were the pH-metric results (RI: A3.09, B3.15, and C9.1). Conclusion We believe that a routine GER assessment should be performed in all CDH patients regardless the presence of symptoms. Level of Evidence This is a Level II study.
Follow-up of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia : Need for Routinary Assessment of Acid Gastroesophageal Reflux with pH-metry / A. Zanini, F. Macchini, G. Farris, A. Morandi, I. Festa, G. Brisighelli, V. Gentilino, E. Leva. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY. - ISSN 0939-7248. - 28:6(2018 Dec), pp. 502-507. [10.1055/s-0037-1607290]
Follow-up of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia : Need for Routinary Assessment of Acid Gastroesophageal Reflux with pH-metry
F. Macchini
;I. Festa;E. Leva
2018
Abstract
Introduction We aim to assess gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in patients treated for congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) and to determine whether a pH-metry investigation should be routinely performed in follow-up. Materials and Methods Twenty-four-hour pH-metry at 1 year was performed in all patients treated for CDH between January 2014 and April 2015 (Group 1). We compared pH-metry results to those of two other groups: children treated for esophageal atresia (EA) (Group 2) and normal babies presenting with typical symptoms (Group 3). All the pH-metric findings were analyzed and compared. Intra-group analysis was performed in Group 1. Results Group 1 consisted of 21, Group 2 of 24, and Group 3 of 21 patients. Mean pH-metry values for Groups 1, 2, and 3 were, respectively: reflux index (RI) 4.3, 5.1, and 3.9; total number of refluxes (NR) 79.5, 88.8, and 88.7; refluxes longer than 5′ (R > 5) 1.7, 2.3, and 1.47; and longest reflux episode (LR) 11.4, 13.3, and 8.6. No significant differences were found between Group 1 and the others. Only two CDH patients presented with GER-related symptoms. Patch was associated with significantly higher RI (8.5 vs. 2.98, p = 0.03). The worse was the defect, the worse were the pH-metric results (RI: A3.09, B3.15, and C9.1). Conclusion We believe that a routine GER assessment should be performed in all CDH patients regardless the presence of symptoms. Level of Evidence This is a Level II study.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Follow-up of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia.pdf
accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione
112.73 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
112.73 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.