Oral rehabilitation by means dental implants has high standards of success. Recently, a new type of two-pieces spiral implants has been introduced in the market. Since few reports focus of the efficacy of this medical device as a reliable tool for oral rehabilitation, here a retrospective study is reported. In the period June-December 2017 one hundred and two spiral fixtures were inserted, half in females and 51 in males. The median age was 56 ± 8 (min-max 36-73 years). Forty-eight implants were inserted in upper jawbone and 54 in mandible. Two implants were lost and thus survival rate (SVR) is 99.9%. Then peri-implant bone resorption was used to investigate the clinical success (success rate, SCR) over time. No implants have a crestal bone resorption greater than 1.5 mm in the first year follow up. No studied variable has an effect on clinical outcome. In conclusion the studied implants have high SCR and SVR so that they are good tools for oral rehabilitation.
Implants outcome inserted in different sites / G. Beltramini, D. Rossi, A. Bolzoni, A. Piva, F. Laganà. - In: JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL REGULATORS & HOMEOSTATIC AGENTS. - ISSN 0393-974X. - 34:1 Suppl. 2(2020 Feb), pp. 13-17.
Implants outcome inserted in different sites
G. Beltramini
Primo
;A. Bolzoni;
2020
Abstract
Oral rehabilitation by means dental implants has high standards of success. Recently, a new type of two-pieces spiral implants has been introduced in the market. Since few reports focus of the efficacy of this medical device as a reliable tool for oral rehabilitation, here a retrospective study is reported. In the period June-December 2017 one hundred and two spiral fixtures were inserted, half in females and 51 in males. The median age was 56 ± 8 (min-max 36-73 years). Forty-eight implants were inserted in upper jawbone and 54 in mandible. Two implants were lost and thus survival rate (SVR) is 99.9%. Then peri-implant bone resorption was used to investigate the clinical success (success rate, SCR) over time. No implants have a crestal bone resorption greater than 1.5 mm in the first year follow up. No studied variable has an effect on clinical outcome. In conclusion the studied implants have high SCR and SVR so that they are good tools for oral rehabilitation.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
JBRHA34-1(s2).pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione
559.99 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
559.99 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.