Oral rehabilitation by means dental implants has high standards of success. Recently, a new type of two-pieces spiral implants has been introduced in the market. Since few reports focus of the efficacy of this medical device as a reliable tool for oral rehabilitation, here a retrospective study is reported. In the period June-December 2017 one hundred and two spiral fixtures were inserted, half in females and 51 in males. The median age was 56 ± 8 (min-max 36-73 years). Forty-eight implants were inserted in upper jawbone and 54 in mandible. Two implants were lost and thus survival rate (SVR) is 99.9%. Then peri-implant bone resorption was used to investigate the clinical success (success rate, SCR) over time. No implants have a crestal bone resorption greater than 1.5 mm in the first year follow up. No studied variable has an effect on clinical outcome. In conclusion the studied implants have high SCR and SVR so that they are good tools for oral rehabilitation.

Implants outcome inserted in different sites / G. Beltramini, D. Rossi, A. Bolzoni, A. Piva, F. Laganà. - In: JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL REGULATORS & HOMEOSTATIC AGENTS. - ISSN 0393-974X. - 34:1 Suppl. 2(2020 Feb), pp. 13-17.

Implants outcome inserted in different sites

G. Beltramini
Primo
;
A. Bolzoni;
2020

Abstract

Oral rehabilitation by means dental implants has high standards of success. Recently, a new type of two-pieces spiral implants has been introduced in the market. Since few reports focus of the efficacy of this medical device as a reliable tool for oral rehabilitation, here a retrospective study is reported. In the period June-December 2017 one hundred and two spiral fixtures were inserted, half in females and 51 in males. The median age was 56 ± 8 (min-max 36-73 years). Forty-eight implants were inserted in upper jawbone and 54 in mandible. Two implants were lost and thus survival rate (SVR) is 99.9%. Then peri-implant bone resorption was used to investigate the clinical success (success rate, SCR) over time. No implants have a crestal bone resorption greater than 1.5 mm in the first year follow up. No studied variable has an effect on clinical outcome. In conclusion the studied implants have high SCR and SVR so that they are good tools for oral rehabilitation.
bone; fixtures; implant; rehabilitation
Settore MED/29 - Chirurgia Maxillofacciale
feb-2020
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
JBRHA34-1(s2).pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 559.99 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
559.99 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/741190
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact