Cerebral autoregulation (CA) is a complex mechanism stabilizing cerebral blood flow (CBF) against arterial pressure (AP) changes. CBF is commonly surrogated with the CBF velocity (CBFV) recorded via transcranial Doppler device from the middle cerebral artery. Most of the studies evaluating CA compute mean CBFV (MCBFV) on a beat-to-beat basis along with mean AP (MAP), but there is not a standard approach to derive MCBFV. In this study, we compare three different strategies to calculate MCBFV: i) between two consecutive diastolic points detected on the CBFV signal (MCBFVCBFV); ii) between two consecutive diastolic points detected on the AP signal (MCBFVAP); iii) between two consecutive R-wave peaks detected on the ECG (MCBFVECG). We analyzed ECG, noninvasive AP and CBFV signals recorded from 23 subjects (age: 28 ± 9 yrs, 13 female) at rest in supine position (REST) and during head-up tilt at 60° (TILT). While means were similar regardless of the considered strategy, variances significantly varied with MCBFVCBFV and MCBFVECG strategy producing the largest and the smallest variance respectively. This result stresses the need to standardize the approach for MCBFV computation to reduce the variability of the results solely due to the method adopted for its computation and favor clinical applications of CA assessment.

Computation of mean cerebral blood flow velocity for the assessment of cerebral autoregulation: Comparison of different strategies / E. Vaini, V. Bari, D. Tonon, B. Cairo, B. De Maria, L. Faes, G. Rossato, A. Porta. - In: COMPUTING IN CARDIOLOGY. - ISSN 2325-887X. - 46:(2019). ((Intervento presentato al convegno CinC Computing in Cardiology 2019 8th 11 September tenutosi a Singapore nel 2019 [10.23919/CinC49843.2019.9005741].

Computation of mean cerebral blood flow velocity for the assessment of cerebral autoregulation: Comparison of different strategies

V. Bari;B. Cairo;A. Porta
Ultimo
2019

Abstract

Cerebral autoregulation (CA) is a complex mechanism stabilizing cerebral blood flow (CBF) against arterial pressure (AP) changes. CBF is commonly surrogated with the CBF velocity (CBFV) recorded via transcranial Doppler device from the middle cerebral artery. Most of the studies evaluating CA compute mean CBFV (MCBFV) on a beat-to-beat basis along with mean AP (MAP), but there is not a standard approach to derive MCBFV. In this study, we compare three different strategies to calculate MCBFV: i) between two consecutive diastolic points detected on the CBFV signal (MCBFVCBFV); ii) between two consecutive diastolic points detected on the AP signal (MCBFVAP); iii) between two consecutive R-wave peaks detected on the ECG (MCBFVECG). We analyzed ECG, noninvasive AP and CBFV signals recorded from 23 subjects (age: 28 ± 9 yrs, 13 female) at rest in supine position (REST) and during head-up tilt at 60° (TILT). While means were similar regardless of the considered strategy, variances significantly varied with MCBFVCBFV and MCBFVECG strategy producing the largest and the smallest variance respectively. This result stresses the need to standardize the approach for MCBFV computation to reduce the variability of the results solely due to the method adopted for its computation and favor clinical applications of CA assessment.
Settore ING-INF/06 - Bioingegneria Elettronica e Informatica
2019
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
EVaini_CinC_2019.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 1.6 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.6 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/735886
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact