Introduction: There has been a constant increase in the number of published surgical videos with preference for open-access sources, but the proportion of videos undergoing peer-review prior to publication has markedly decreased, raising questions over quality of the educational content presented. The aim of this study was the development and validation of a standard framework for the appraisal of surgical videos submitted for presentation and publication, the LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) video assessment tool. Methods: An international committee identified items for inclusion in the LAP-VEGaS video assessment tool and finalised the marking score utilising Delphi methodology. The tool was finally validated by anonymous evaluation of selected videos by a group of validators not involved in the tool development. Results: 9 items were included in the LAP-VEGaS video assessment tool, with every item scoring from 0 (item not presented in the video) to 2 (item extensively presented in the video), with a total marking score ranging from 0 to 18. The LAP-VEGaS video assessment tool resulted highly accurate in identifying and selecting videos for acceptance for conference presentation and publication, with high level of internal consistency and generalisability. Conclusions: We propose that peer review in adherence to the LAP-VEGaS video assessment tool could enhance the overall quality of published video outputs. Graphic Abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.].

Development and validation of a recommended checklist for assessment of surgical videos quality : the LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) video assessment tool / V. Celentano, N. Smart, R.A. Cahill, A. Spinelli, M.C. Giglio, J. McGrath, A. Obermair, G. Pellino, H. Hasegawa, P. Lal, L. Lorenzon, N. De Angelis, L. Boni, S. Gupta, J.P. Griffith, A.G. Acheson, T.D. Cecil, M.G. Coleman. - In: SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY. - ISSN 0930-2794. - 35:3(2021 Mar), pp. 1362-1369. [10.1007/s00464-020-07517-4]

Development and validation of a recommended checklist for assessment of surgical videos quality : the LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) video assessment tool

L. Boni;
2021

Abstract

Introduction: There has been a constant increase in the number of published surgical videos with preference for open-access sources, but the proportion of videos undergoing peer-review prior to publication has markedly decreased, raising questions over quality of the educational content presented. The aim of this study was the development and validation of a standard framework for the appraisal of surgical videos submitted for presentation and publication, the LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) video assessment tool. Methods: An international committee identified items for inclusion in the LAP-VEGaS video assessment tool and finalised the marking score utilising Delphi methodology. The tool was finally validated by anonymous evaluation of selected videos by a group of validators not involved in the tool development. Results: 9 items were included in the LAP-VEGaS video assessment tool, with every item scoring from 0 (item not presented in the video) to 2 (item extensively presented in the video), with a total marking score ranging from 0 to 18. The LAP-VEGaS video assessment tool resulted highly accurate in identifying and selecting videos for acceptance for conference presentation and publication, with high level of internal consistency and generalisability. Conclusions: We propose that peer review in adherence to the LAP-VEGaS video assessment tool could enhance the overall quality of published video outputs. Graphic Abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.].
Guidelines; Laparoscopic surgery; Minimally invasive surgery; Surgical training; Video assessment tool
Settore MED/18 - Chirurgia Generale
mar-2021
apr-2020
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2021- MODIFICARE HANDLE E ALLEGATO - Development and validation of a recommended checklist for assessment of.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 875.87 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
875.87 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/735785
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 12
  • Scopus 41
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 39
social impact