Introduction: There has been a constant increase in the number of published surgical videos with preference for open-access sources, but the proportion of videos undergoing peer-review prior to publication has markedly decreased, raising questions over quality of the educational content presented. The aim of this study was the development and validation of a standard framework for the appraisal of surgical videos submitted for presentation and publication, the LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) video assessment tool. Methods: An international committee identified items for inclusion in the LAP-VEGaS video assessment tool and finalised the marking score utilising Delphi methodology. The tool was finally validated by anonymous evaluation of selected videos by a group of validators not involved in the tool development. Results: 9 items were included in the LAP-VEGaS video assessment tool, with every item scoring from 0 (item not presented in the video) to 2 (item extensively presented in the video), with a total marking score ranging from 0 to 18. The LAP-VEGaS video assessment tool resulted highly accurate in identifying and selecting videos for acceptance for conference presentation and publication, with high level of internal consistency and generalisability. Conclusions: We propose that peer review in adherence to the LAP-VEGaS video assessment tool could enhance the overall quality of published video outputs. Graphic Abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.].
Development and validation of a recommended checklist for assessment of surgical videos quality : the LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) video assessment tool / V. Celentano, N. Smart, R.A. Cahill, A. Spinelli, M.C. Giglio, J. McGrath, A. Obermair, G. Pellino, H. Hasegawa, P. Lal, L. Lorenzon, N. De Angelis, L. Boni, S. Gupta, J.P. Griffith, A.G. Acheson, T.D. Cecil, M.G. Coleman. - In: SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY. - ISSN 0930-2794. - 35:3(2021 Mar), pp. 1362-1369. [10.1007/s00464-020-07517-4]
Development and validation of a recommended checklist for assessment of surgical videos quality : the LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) video assessment tool
L. Boni;
2021
Abstract
Introduction: There has been a constant increase in the number of published surgical videos with preference for open-access sources, but the proportion of videos undergoing peer-review prior to publication has markedly decreased, raising questions over quality of the educational content presented. The aim of this study was the development and validation of a standard framework for the appraisal of surgical videos submitted for presentation and publication, the LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) video assessment tool. Methods: An international committee identified items for inclusion in the LAP-VEGaS video assessment tool and finalised the marking score utilising Delphi methodology. The tool was finally validated by anonymous evaluation of selected videos by a group of validators not involved in the tool development. Results: 9 items were included in the LAP-VEGaS video assessment tool, with every item scoring from 0 (item not presented in the video) to 2 (item extensively presented in the video), with a total marking score ranging from 0 to 18. The LAP-VEGaS video assessment tool resulted highly accurate in identifying and selecting videos for acceptance for conference presentation and publication, with high level of internal consistency and generalisability. Conclusions: We propose that peer review in adherence to the LAP-VEGaS video assessment tool could enhance the overall quality of published video outputs. Graphic Abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.].File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
2021- MODIFICARE HANDLE E ALLEGATO - Development and validation of a recommended checklist for assessment of.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione
875.87 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
875.87 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.