Among lesions with uncertain malignant potential found at percutaneous breast biopsy, atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) carries both the highest risk of underestimation and the closest and most pathologist-dependent differential diagnosis with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), matching the latter's features save for size only. ADH is therefore routinely surgically excised, but single-centre studies with limited sample size found low rates of upgrade to invasive cancer or DCIS. This suggests the possibility of surveillance over surgery in selected subgroups, considering the 2% threshold allowing for follow-up according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. A recent meta-analysis on 6458 lesions counters this approach, confirming that, surgically excised or managed with surveillance, ADH carries a 29% and 5% upgrade rate, respectively, invariably higher than 2% even in subgroups considering biopsy guidance and technique, needle calibre, apparent complete lesion removal. The high heterogeneity (I2 = 80%) found in this meta-analysis reaffirmed the need to synthesize evidence from systematic reviews to achieve generalizable results, fit for guidelines development. Limited tissue sampling at percutaneous biopsy intrinsically hampers the prediction of ADH-associated malignancy. This prediction could be improved by using contrast-enhanced breast imaging and applying artificial intelligence on both pathology and imaging results, allowing for overtreatment reduction.

An update on the management of breast atypical ductal hyperplasia / S. Schiaffino, A. Cozzi, F. Sardanelli. - In: BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY. - ISSN 0007-1285. - 93:1110(2020 Jun 01), pp. 20200117.1-20200117.3. [10.1259/bjr.20200117]

An update on the management of breast atypical ductal hyperplasia

A. Cozzi
Secondo
;
F. Sardanelli
Ultimo
2020

Abstract

Among lesions with uncertain malignant potential found at percutaneous breast biopsy, atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) carries both the highest risk of underestimation and the closest and most pathologist-dependent differential diagnosis with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), matching the latter's features save for size only. ADH is therefore routinely surgically excised, but single-centre studies with limited sample size found low rates of upgrade to invasive cancer or DCIS. This suggests the possibility of surveillance over surgery in selected subgroups, considering the 2% threshold allowing for follow-up according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. A recent meta-analysis on 6458 lesions counters this approach, confirming that, surgically excised or managed with surveillance, ADH carries a 29% and 5% upgrade rate, respectively, invariably higher than 2% even in subgroups considering biopsy guidance and technique, needle calibre, apparent complete lesion removal. The high heterogeneity (I2 = 80%) found in this meta-analysis reaffirmed the need to synthesize evidence from systematic reviews to achieve generalizable results, fit for guidelines development. Limited tissue sampling at percutaneous biopsy intrinsically hampers the prediction of ADH-associated malignancy. This prediction could be improved by using contrast-enhanced breast imaging and applying artificial intelligence on both pathology and imaging results, allowing for overtreatment reduction.
Settore MED/36 - Diagnostica per Immagini e Radioterapia
1-giu-2020
1-apr-2020
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Full Manuscript_R1_Clean.pdf

Open Access dal 02/06/2021

Tipologia: Post-print, accepted manuscript ecc. (versione accettata dall'editore)
Dimensione 340.36 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
340.36 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
bjr.20200117.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 107.77 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
107.77 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/724744
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 8
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact