Aim: To evaluate dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI and diffusion weighted (DW)-MRI diagnostic value to differentiate Warthin tumors (WT) by pleomorphic adenomas (PA). Materials & methods: Seven WT and seven PA were examined. DCE- and DW-MRI parameters were extracted from volumes of interest; volume of interest-based averages and standard deviations were calculated. Statistical analysis included: linear discriminant analysis, receiver operating characteristic curves, sensitivity and specificity. Results: No single feature was able to differentiate WT by PA (p > 0.05); linear discriminant analysis analysis showed that a combination of all features or combinations of feature pairs (namely: K trans (std) & f(std), K trans (std) & D(std), k ep (std) & D(std), MRE(av) & TTP(av)) might achieve sensitivity (SENS), specificity (SPEC) = 100%, with a slight reduction after cross-validation analysis (SENS = 0.875; SPEC = 1). Conclusion: Although preliminary and not conclusive, our results suggest that differentiation between WT and PA is possible through a multiparametric approach based on combination of DCE- and DW-MRI parameters.
A multiparametric analysis combining DCE-MRI- and IVIM -derived parameters to improve differentiation of parotid tumors: A pilot study / F. Patella, G. Franceschelli, M. Petrillo, M. Sansone, R. Fusco, F. Pesapane, G. Pompili, A.M. Ierardi, A.M. Saibene, L. Moneghini, F. Biglioli, G. Carrafiello. - In: FUTURE ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 1479-6694. - 14:28(2018 Dec), pp. 2893-2903. [10.2217/fon-2017-0655]
A multiparametric analysis combining DCE-MRI- and IVIM -derived parameters to improve differentiation of parotid tumors: A pilot study
A.M. Saibene;F. BiglioliPenultimo
;G. CarrafielloUltimo
2018
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI and diffusion weighted (DW)-MRI diagnostic value to differentiate Warthin tumors (WT) by pleomorphic adenomas (PA). Materials & methods: Seven WT and seven PA were examined. DCE- and DW-MRI parameters were extracted from volumes of interest; volume of interest-based averages and standard deviations were calculated. Statistical analysis included: linear discriminant analysis, receiver operating characteristic curves, sensitivity and specificity. Results: No single feature was able to differentiate WT by PA (p > 0.05); linear discriminant analysis analysis showed that a combination of all features or combinations of feature pairs (namely: K trans (std) & f(std), K trans (std) & D(std), k ep (std) & D(std), MRE(av) & TTP(av)) might achieve sensitivity (SENS), specificity (SPEC) = 100%, with a slight reduction after cross-validation analysis (SENS = 0.875; SPEC = 1). Conclusion: Although preliminary and not conclusive, our results suggest that differentiation between WT and PA is possible through a multiparametric approach based on combination of DCE- and DW-MRI parameters.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
A multiparametric analysis combining DCE and IVIM - parotid (2018).pdf
accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione
1.64 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.64 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.