Purpose: To test the effect of tumor location (urachal vs. non-urachal) on cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in patients with adenocarcinoma of the urinary bladder (ADKUB). Materials and methods: Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry (2004–2016), we identified patients with non-metastatic (≤ T4N0M0) ADKUB. Stratification was made according to tumor location: urachal vs. non-urachal ADKUB. Kaplan–Meier plots and multivariable Cox regression models were fitted before and after 1:3 propensity score (PS) matching and separate Cox regression models were refitted before and after inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Results: Of 1681 patients, 226 (13.5%) vs. 1455 (86.5%) harboured urachal vs. non-urachal ADKUB, respectively. Five-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates were, respectively, 75 vs. 67% for urachal vs. non-urachal ADKUB (p = 0.001). In subgroup analyses of ≤ T2N0M0 patients, 5-year CSS rates were, respectively, 84 vs. 73% for urachal vs. non-urachal ADKUB (p = 0.006). In subgroup analyses of T3-4N0M0 patients, 5-year CSS rates were, respectively, 68 vs. 49% for urachal vs. non-urachal ADKUB (p < 0.001). In multivariable Cox regression models, urachal ADKUB was associated with lower CSM rates (HR 0.6; p = 0.01). Virtually, the same findings were recorded after 1:3 PS matching (HR 0.6; p = 0.009) as well as when Cox regression models were refitted after IPTW (HR 0.7; p = 0.01). Conclusion: The distinction between urachal vs. non-urachal ADKUB indicates better prognosis when the origin of the tumor is urachal, regardless of methodological approach used for the comparison.

Survival of contemporary patients with non-metastatic urachal vs. non-urachal adenocarcinoma of the urinary bladder / S. Luzzago, C. Palumbo, G. Rosiello, A. Pecoraro, M. Deuker, F.A. Mistretta, Z. Tian, G. Musi, E. Montanari, S.F. Shariat, F. Saad, A. Briganti, O. de Cobelli, P.I. Karakiewicz. - In: WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY. - ISSN 0724-4983. - (2020). [Epub ahead of print]

Survival of contemporary patients with non-metastatic urachal vs. non-urachal adenocarcinoma of the urinary bladder

S. Luzzago
Primo
;
C. Palumbo
Secondo
;
F.A. Mistretta;G. Musi;E. Montanari;O. de Cobelli
Penultimo
;
2020

Abstract

Purpose: To test the effect of tumor location (urachal vs. non-urachal) on cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in patients with adenocarcinoma of the urinary bladder (ADKUB). Materials and methods: Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry (2004–2016), we identified patients with non-metastatic (≤ T4N0M0) ADKUB. Stratification was made according to tumor location: urachal vs. non-urachal ADKUB. Kaplan–Meier plots and multivariable Cox regression models were fitted before and after 1:3 propensity score (PS) matching and separate Cox regression models were refitted before and after inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Results: Of 1681 patients, 226 (13.5%) vs. 1455 (86.5%) harboured urachal vs. non-urachal ADKUB, respectively. Five-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates were, respectively, 75 vs. 67% for urachal vs. non-urachal ADKUB (p = 0.001). In subgroup analyses of ≤ T2N0M0 patients, 5-year CSS rates were, respectively, 84 vs. 73% for urachal vs. non-urachal ADKUB (p = 0.006). In subgroup analyses of T3-4N0M0 patients, 5-year CSS rates were, respectively, 68 vs. 49% for urachal vs. non-urachal ADKUB (p < 0.001). In multivariable Cox regression models, urachal ADKUB was associated with lower CSM rates (HR 0.6; p = 0.01). Virtually, the same findings were recorded after 1:3 PS matching (HR 0.6; p = 0.009) as well as when Cox regression models were refitted after IPTW (HR 0.7; p = 0.01). Conclusion: The distinction between urachal vs. non-urachal ADKUB indicates better prognosis when the origin of the tumor is urachal, regardless of methodological approach used for the comparison.
Adenocarcinoma; Urachal; Non-urachal; Propensity score; Inverse probability of treatment weighting
Settore MED/24 - Urologia
2020
20-gen-2020
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Luzzago2020_Article_SurvivalOfContemporaryPatients.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 1.17 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.17 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/717983
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 5
  • Scopus 9
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
social impact