While recent surveys show that most stakeholders recognise the importance of peer review to the publication process, there is a lack of systematic research on the topic. In a period of hyper-competition for resources, with perverse incentives that lead to academic capitalism and a “publish or perish” mentality, the lack of robust and cumulative research on approaches, models and practices of peer review can slow down efforts towards fostering research integrity and the credibility of scholarly communication. A major challenge in studying peer review systematically is the lack of available data. While data sharing in scientific research has made relevant progress in certain fields, the lack of infrastructures to promote the sharing of peer review data among publishers, journals and academic scholars, the challenges posed by privacy and data protection legislation, and the perceived lack of incentives for publishers, learned societies and journals to share data, have all hampered efforts in this important domain. While public authorities, learned societies and publishers may face different priorities, incentives and obstacles regarding data sharing, the time has come to call to action all stakeholders who play a part in this field. In this paper, we argue that an infrastructure for data sharing is needed to stimulate independent, collaborative, public research on peer review and we suggest measures and initiatives to set up a collaborative effort towards this goal.

Data Sharing and Research on Peer Review: A Call to Action / F. Squazzoni, A. Marusic, M. Seeber, B. Menhami, M. Willis, P. Hurst, A. Birukou, T. Ross-Hellauer, C. Maccallum, R. Lammey, P. Rodgers, J. Hyot, D. Nicholas, L. Haire, P. Dondio, H. Murray, I. Puebla, V. Dignum, T. Barros, S. Cowley, P. Ahrweiler, G. Bravo, K. Shankar, H. Blom, J. Van Rossum, G. Pedrazzi, F. Bianchi, F. Grimaldo. - (2019 Nov 05). [10.31235/osf.io/sr6eg]

Data Sharing and Research on Peer Review: A Call to Action

F. Squazzoni
Primo
;
F. Bianchi;
2019

Abstract

While recent surveys show that most stakeholders recognise the importance of peer review to the publication process, there is a lack of systematic research on the topic. In a period of hyper-competition for resources, with perverse incentives that lead to academic capitalism and a “publish or perish” mentality, the lack of robust and cumulative research on approaches, models and practices of peer review can slow down efforts towards fostering research integrity and the credibility of scholarly communication. A major challenge in studying peer review systematically is the lack of available data. While data sharing in scientific research has made relevant progress in certain fields, the lack of infrastructures to promote the sharing of peer review data among publishers, journals and academic scholars, the challenges posed by privacy and data protection legislation, and the perceived lack of incentives for publishers, learned societies and journals to share data, have all hampered efforts in this important domain. While public authorities, learned societies and publishers may face different priorities, incentives and obstacles regarding data sharing, the time has come to call to action all stakeholders who play a part in this field. In this paper, we argue that an infrastructure for data sharing is needed to stimulate independent, collaborative, public research on peer review and we suggest measures and initiatives to set up a collaborative effort towards this goal.
Peer review; journals; data sharing; infrastructure
Settore SPS/07 - Sociologia Generale
5-nov-2019
https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/sr6eg/
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Squazzoni2019PeereCallToAction.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Articolo
Tipologia: Altro
Dimensione 340.56 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
340.56 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/717114
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact