BACKGROUND: The morphological examination of urinary sediment (MEUS) is traditionally associated with urinalysis (UA), with workload implications and the need for automation of its execution. METHODS: Considering MEUS as a test requiring specialized knowhow and skill for its execution, since 2005 in our laboratory it is performed for inpatients only upon specific request. Eleven years after, we have analyzed the long-term impact of this approach on the provided service. We evaluated results in the 2009-2016 period, in which our hospital did not undergo any change both in the number of beds and in the clinical case-mix. RESULTS: From 2009 to 2013 an average of 2264 MEUS and 10,204 UA per year were ordered, respectively, with an average ratio of 22.2%. Since 2014, a change on computerized order entry involving MEUS caused a further decrease of its requests (in average, 923 per year), which was not associated to a decrease in UA (in average, 9810 per year) (in average, MEUS/UA 9.4%). MEUS requests came mainly from Paediatrics (47.8%), Nephrology (20.9%) and Rheumatology (18.3%) wards. By filling a satisfaction survey, clinical wards evaluated the provided service as satisfactory, while highlighting some critical issues, mainly referred to preanalytical phase. CONCLUSIONS: The alternative proposal for managing MEUS presented in this paper markedly reduces the number of requests and increases their appropriateness. This is achieved without any negative impact on patient care.

Una proposta alternativa per gestire l’esame morfologico del sedimento urinario e aumentarne l’appropriatezza = An alternative proposal for managing morphological examination of urinary sediment and increasing its appropriateness / C. Robbiano, I. Infusino, F. Braga, A. Dolci, M. Panteghini. - In: GIORNALE ITALIANO DI NEFROLOGIA. - ISSN 1724-5990. - 35:5(2018).

Una proposta alternativa per gestire l’esame morfologico del sedimento urinario e aumentarne l’appropriatezza = An alternative proposal for managing morphological examination of urinary sediment and increasing its appropriateness

C. Robbiano;I. Infusino;F. Braga;A. Dolci;M. Panteghini
2018

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The morphological examination of urinary sediment (MEUS) is traditionally associated with urinalysis (UA), with workload implications and the need for automation of its execution. METHODS: Considering MEUS as a test requiring specialized knowhow and skill for its execution, since 2005 in our laboratory it is performed for inpatients only upon specific request. Eleven years after, we have analyzed the long-term impact of this approach on the provided service. We evaluated results in the 2009-2016 period, in which our hospital did not undergo any change both in the number of beds and in the clinical case-mix. RESULTS: From 2009 to 2013 an average of 2264 MEUS and 10,204 UA per year were ordered, respectively, with an average ratio of 22.2%. Since 2014, a change on computerized order entry involving MEUS caused a further decrease of its requests (in average, 923 per year), which was not associated to a decrease in UA (in average, 9810 per year) (in average, MEUS/UA 9.4%). MEUS requests came mainly from Paediatrics (47.8%), Nephrology (20.9%) and Rheumatology (18.3%) wards. By filling a satisfaction survey, clinical wards evaluated the provided service as satisfactory, while highlighting some critical issues, mainly referred to preanalytical phase. CONCLUSIONS: The alternative proposal for managing MEUS presented in this paper markedly reduces the number of requests and increases their appropriateness. This is achieved without any negative impact on patient care.
Urinalysis; Clinical governance; Patient safety
Settore BIO/12 - Biochimica Clinica e Biologia Molecolare Clinica
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2018 G Ital Nefrol. Dolci et al. Sedimento urinario.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 1 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Caricamento pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/707452
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact