OBJECTIVE:: To conduct a review and meta-analysis of risks of cancers of the lung and head and neck (HN) from exposure to rock wool (RW) and glass wool (GW). METHODS:: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of risk estimates of lung and HN cancer in epidemiologic studies of workers exposed to man-made vitreous fibers (MMVF), specifically RW and GW. RESULTS:: Sixteen estimates of lung cancer risk yielded a summary relative risk (RR) of 1.21 (95% CI = 1.11 to 1.32, based on 1662 exposed cases). Corresponding RRs were 1.26 (95% CI = 1.10 to 1.44) in studies of production workers (with similar risk for RW and GW workers), 1.06 (95% CI = 0.77 to 1.48) in studies of end users, and 1.18 (95% CI = 0.98 to 1.42) in community-based studies. The summary RR for HN cancer was 1.36 (95% CI = 1.13 to 1.63, 414 exposed cases). With a few exceptions, all studies that assessed the risk of lung or HN cancer according to various indices of MMVF exposure failed to detect a dose-risk relation. There was limited evidence of a confounding effect of tobacco smoking. No clear excess of pleural mesothelioma has been reported in MMVF-exposed workers. CONCLUSIONS:: Despite a small elevation in RR for lung cancer among MMVF production workers, the lack of excess risk among end users, the absence of any dose-risk relation, the likelihood of detection bias, and the potential for residual confounding by smoking and asbestos exposure argue against a carcinogenic effect of MMVF, RW, or GW at this time. Similar conclusions apply to HN cancer risk among workers exposed to MMVF. Copyright

Occupational exposure to rock wool and glass wool and risk of cancers of the lung and the head and neck: a systematic review and meta-analysis / L. Lipworth, C. La Vecchia, C. Bosetti, J.K. McLaughlin. - In: JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE. - ISSN 1076-2752. - 51:9(2009), pp. 1075-1087. [10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181b35125]

Occupational exposure to rock wool and glass wool and risk of cancers of the lung and the head and neck: a systematic review and meta-analysis

C. La Vecchia
Secondo
;
2009

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:: To conduct a review and meta-analysis of risks of cancers of the lung and head and neck (HN) from exposure to rock wool (RW) and glass wool (GW). METHODS:: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of risk estimates of lung and HN cancer in epidemiologic studies of workers exposed to man-made vitreous fibers (MMVF), specifically RW and GW. RESULTS:: Sixteen estimates of lung cancer risk yielded a summary relative risk (RR) of 1.21 (95% CI = 1.11 to 1.32, based on 1662 exposed cases). Corresponding RRs were 1.26 (95% CI = 1.10 to 1.44) in studies of production workers (with similar risk for RW and GW workers), 1.06 (95% CI = 0.77 to 1.48) in studies of end users, and 1.18 (95% CI = 0.98 to 1.42) in community-based studies. The summary RR for HN cancer was 1.36 (95% CI = 1.13 to 1.63, 414 exposed cases). With a few exceptions, all studies that assessed the risk of lung or HN cancer according to various indices of MMVF exposure failed to detect a dose-risk relation. There was limited evidence of a confounding effect of tobacco smoking. No clear excess of pleural mesothelioma has been reported in MMVF-exposed workers. CONCLUSIONS:: Despite a small elevation in RR for lung cancer among MMVF production workers, the lack of excess risk among end users, the absence of any dose-risk relation, the likelihood of detection bias, and the potential for residual confounding by smoking and asbestos exposure argue against a carcinogenic effect of MMVF, RW, or GW at this time. Similar conclusions apply to HN cancer risk among workers exposed to MMVF. Copyright
Settore MED/01 - Statistica Medica
2009
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/70529
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus 29
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 21
social impact