Background: Fungemia represents a public health concern. Knowing aetiology and activity of the antifungals is critical for the management of bloodstream infections. Therefore, surveillance on local/international levels is desirable for a prompt administration of appropriate therapy. Methods: Data on fungi responsible for fungemia and antifungal susceptibility profiles were collected from a laboratory-based surveillance over 2016–2017 in 12 hospitals located in Lombardia, Italy. The trend of this infection in twenty years was analysed. Results: A total of 1024 episodes were evaluated. Rate of candiaemia progressively increased up to 1.46/1000 admissions. C.albicans was the most common species (52%), followed by C. parapsilosis (15%) and C glabrata (13%). As in the previous surveys the antifungal resistance is rare (echinocandins < 2%, fluconazole 6%, amphotericin B 0.6%). Fungi other than Candida were responsible for 18 episodes: Cryptococcus neoformans (5 cases), Fusarium spp. (4), Magnusiomyces clavatus (3), Saccharomyces cerevisiae (3), Rhodotorula spp. (2), Exophiala dermatitidis (1). All fungi, except S.cerevisiae, were intrinsically resistant to echinocandins. Some isolates showed also elevated azole MIC. Conclusions: No particular changes in terms of species distribution and antifungal susceptibility patterns was noted. However, surveillance programs are needed to monitor trends in antifungal resistance, steer stewardship activities, orient empirical treatment.

Evolution of fungemia in an Italian region / A. Prigitano, C. Cavanna, M. Passera, M. Gelmi, E. Sala, C. Ossi, A. Grancini, M. Calabro, S. Bramati, M. Tejada, F. Lallitto, C. Farina, V. Rognoni, M.A. Fasano, B. Pini, L. Romano, M. Cogliati, M.C. Esposto, A.M. Tortorano. - In: JOURNAL DE MYCOLOGIE MEDICALE. - ISSN 1156-5233. - 30:1(2020), pp. 100906.1-100906.6. [10.1016/j.mycmed.2019.100906]

Evolution of fungemia in an Italian region

A. Prigitano
Primo
;
L. Romano;M. Cogliati;M.C. Esposto
Penultimo
;
A.M. Tortorano
Ultimo
2020

Abstract

Background: Fungemia represents a public health concern. Knowing aetiology and activity of the antifungals is critical for the management of bloodstream infections. Therefore, surveillance on local/international levels is desirable for a prompt administration of appropriate therapy. Methods: Data on fungi responsible for fungemia and antifungal susceptibility profiles were collected from a laboratory-based surveillance over 2016–2017 in 12 hospitals located in Lombardia, Italy. The trend of this infection in twenty years was analysed. Results: A total of 1024 episodes were evaluated. Rate of candiaemia progressively increased up to 1.46/1000 admissions. C.albicans was the most common species (52%), followed by C. parapsilosis (15%) and C glabrata (13%). As in the previous surveys the antifungal resistance is rare (echinocandins < 2%, fluconazole 6%, amphotericin B 0.6%). Fungi other than Candida were responsible for 18 episodes: Cryptococcus neoformans (5 cases), Fusarium spp. (4), Magnusiomyces clavatus (3), Saccharomyces cerevisiae (3), Rhodotorula spp. (2), Exophiala dermatitidis (1). All fungi, except S.cerevisiae, were intrinsically resistant to echinocandins. Some isolates showed also elevated azole MIC. Conclusions: No particular changes in terms of species distribution and antifungal susceptibility patterns was noted. However, surveillance programs are needed to monitor trends in antifungal resistance, steer stewardship activities, orient empirical treatment.
Antifungal resistance; Candida; Candidaemia; Epidemiology; Fungemia
Settore MED/42 - Igiene Generale e Applicata
2020
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2020 FungLo.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 521.8 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
521.8 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/701540
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 8
  • Scopus 20
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 20
social impact