The Document is the result of a disciplinary discussion that the Authors – legal scholars and professionals with long-standing experience in the related topics – decided to open on the main legal end-of life issues raised by Order no. 207/2018 of the Italian Constitutional Court, which declared the absolute ban on assisted suicide unconstitutional under certain conditions and called upon the Parliament to regulate the subject. Starting from the “personalist” and “pluralist” principles, as well as from the principles of equality and self-determination enshrined in the Italian Constitution, the Document offers a “constitutionally oriented” and scientific grounded understanding of the wider concept of “medical assistance to die”. The Document therefore includes some operational proposals on a huge number of tricky issues, such as the prerequisites and conditions to have access to assisted dying, the healthcare professionals involved, the role of the National Healthcare Service, a clear and wellstructured procedure, the regulation of conscientious objection, as well as on issues concerning the source of law to be chosen, the related financial coverage, and the relationships and coordination with other legal rules, including the codes of professional ethics.

Aiuto medico a morire e diritto: per la costruzione di un dibattito pubblico, plurale e consapevole : documento di sintesi del gruppo di lavoro in materia di aiuto medico al morire / S. Azzini, G. Battistella, L. Busatta, C. Casonato, M.E. D'Amico, M. Fasan, M. Foglia, S. Gianello, F. Giardina, G.R. Gristina, C. Iannello, F.C. La Vattiata, B. Liberali, V. Molaschi, T. Pasquino, S. Penasa, R. Pescatore, C. Piciocchi, L. Poli, E. Pulice, C.M. Reale, S. Rossi, A. Santosuosso, A. Tigrino, M. Tomasi, A. Vallini, P. Veronesi, V. Zagrebelsky. - In: BIOLAW JOURNAL. - ISSN 2284-4503. - 3(2019), pp. 159-177. [10.15168/2284-4503-446]

Aiuto medico a morire e diritto: per la costruzione di un dibattito pubblico, plurale e consapevole : documento di sintesi del gruppo di lavoro in materia di aiuto medico al morire

M.E. D'Amico
;
F. Giardina;C. Iannello;B. Liberali
;
V. Molaschi;L. Poli;P. Veronesi;
2019

Abstract

The Document is the result of a disciplinary discussion that the Authors – legal scholars and professionals with long-standing experience in the related topics – decided to open on the main legal end-of life issues raised by Order no. 207/2018 of the Italian Constitutional Court, which declared the absolute ban on assisted suicide unconstitutional under certain conditions and called upon the Parliament to regulate the subject. Starting from the “personalist” and “pluralist” principles, as well as from the principles of equality and self-determination enshrined in the Italian Constitution, the Document offers a “constitutionally oriented” and scientific grounded understanding of the wider concept of “medical assistance to die”. The Document therefore includes some operational proposals on a huge number of tricky issues, such as the prerequisites and conditions to have access to assisted dying, the healthcare professionals involved, the role of the National Healthcare Service, a clear and wellstructured procedure, the regulation of conscientious objection, as well as on issues concerning the source of law to be chosen, the related financial coverage, and the relationships and coordination with other legal rules, including the codes of professional ethics.
Assisted suicide; self-determination; Italian Constitutional Court; palliative care; parliament
Settore IUS/08 - Diritto Costituzionale
Settore IUS/17 - Diritto Penale
2019
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
54. Gruppo di lavoro aiuto medico al morire.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 520.57 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
520.57 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/699874
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact