Students’ confidence about their knowledge may yield high or low discrepancy in contrast to actual performance. Therefore, investigating students’ behavior towards corrective feedback (received after answering a question) becomes of particular interest. We conducted three experimental sessions with 94 undergraduate students using a computer-based assessment system wherein students specified confidence level (as high or low) with each submitted response. This research study exploits their logged data to provide analyses of: (1) students’ behaviors towards corrective feedback in relation to their confidence (about his/her answers), and, (2) impact of seeking corrective feedback on student’s subsequent attempt. In conformance with previous studies, we determine that students tend to overestimate their abilities. Data analysis also shows a significant difference infv students’ feedback seeking behavior with respect to distinct confidence-outcome categories. Interestingly, feedback seeking was predicted by (student) response’s outcome irrespective of its related confidence level, whereas, feedback reading time shows dependency on the confidence level. Our most important finding is that feedback seeking behavior shows a positive impact on students’ confidence-outcome category in the next attempt. Different possibilities for utilizing these results for future work and supporting adaptation based on students’ needs are discussed in the conclusions.

Corrective feedback and its implications on students’ confidence-based assessment / R. Maqsood, P. Ceravolo (COMMUNICATIONS IN COMPUTER AND INFORMATION SCIENCE). - In: Technology Enhanced Assessment / [a cura di] S. Draaijer, D. Joosten-ten Brinke, E. Ras. - [s.l] : Springer Verlag, 2019. - ISBN 9783030252632. - pp. 55-72 (( Intervento presentato al 21. convegno International Conference on Technology Enhanced Assessment tenutosi a Amsterdam nel 2018 [10.1007/978-3-030-25264-9_5].

Corrective feedback and its implications on students’ confidence-based assessment

R. Maqsood
Primo
;
P. Ceravolo
Secondo
2019

Abstract

Students’ confidence about their knowledge may yield high or low discrepancy in contrast to actual performance. Therefore, investigating students’ behavior towards corrective feedback (received after answering a question) becomes of particular interest. We conducted three experimental sessions with 94 undergraduate students using a computer-based assessment system wherein students specified confidence level (as high or low) with each submitted response. This research study exploits their logged data to provide analyses of: (1) students’ behaviors towards corrective feedback in relation to their confidence (about his/her answers), and, (2) impact of seeking corrective feedback on student’s subsequent attempt. In conformance with previous studies, we determine that students tend to overestimate their abilities. Data analysis also shows a significant difference infv students’ feedback seeking behavior with respect to distinct confidence-outcome categories. Interestingly, feedback seeking was predicted by (student) response’s outcome irrespective of its related confidence level, whereas, feedback reading time shows dependency on the confidence level. Our most important finding is that feedback seeking behavior shows a positive impact on students’ confidence-outcome category in the next attempt. Different possibilities for utilizing these results for future work and supporting adaptation based on students’ needs are discussed in the conclusions.
Certitude level; Computer-based assessment; Confidence-based assessment; Confidence-outcome category; Feedback reading time; Feedback seeking
Settore INF/01 - Informatica
2019
Book Part (author)
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/699312
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact