Available evidence on the impact of ovarian stimulation on the progression of endometriosis or its recurrence was systematically reviewed. Data from ovarian stimulation alone, or associated with intrauterine insemination (IUI) or IVF, were included. Sixteen studies were selected. Initial case reports (n = 11) documented some severe clinical complications. However, subsequent observational studies were more reassuring. Overall, five conclusions can be drawn: (i) IVF does not worsen endometriosis-related pain symptoms (moderate quality evidence); (ii) IVF does not increase the risk of endometriosis recurrence (moderate quality evidence); (iii) the impact of IVF on ovarian endometriomas, if present at all, is mild (low quality evidence); (iv) IUI may increase the risk of endometriosis recurrence (low quality evidence); (v) deep invasive endometriosis might progress with ovarian stimulation (very low quality evidence). In conclusion, available evidence is generally reassuring (at least for IVF) and does not justify aggressive clinical approaches such as prophylactic surgery before assisted reproductive technology treatment to prevent endometriosis progression or recurrence. However, further evidence is required before being able to reach definitive conclusions. In particular, the potential effects on deep invasive endometriosis and the possible synergistic effect of stimulation and pregnancy are two areas that need to be explored further.

Ovarian stimulation and endometriosis progression or recurrence: a systematic review / E. Somigliana, P. Vigano, L. Benaglia, A. Busnelli, A. Paffoni, P. Vercellini. - In: REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE. - ISSN 1472-6483. - 38:2(2019 Feb), pp. 185-194. [10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.11.021]

Ovarian stimulation and endometriosis progression or recurrence: a systematic review

E. Somigliana
Primo
;
L. Benaglia;A. Busnelli;A. Paffoni
Penultimo
;
P. Vercellini
Ultimo
2019

Abstract

Available evidence on the impact of ovarian stimulation on the progression of endometriosis or its recurrence was systematically reviewed. Data from ovarian stimulation alone, or associated with intrauterine insemination (IUI) or IVF, were included. Sixteen studies were selected. Initial case reports (n = 11) documented some severe clinical complications. However, subsequent observational studies were more reassuring. Overall, five conclusions can be drawn: (i) IVF does not worsen endometriosis-related pain symptoms (moderate quality evidence); (ii) IVF does not increase the risk of endometriosis recurrence (moderate quality evidence); (iii) the impact of IVF on ovarian endometriomas, if present at all, is mild (low quality evidence); (iv) IUI may increase the risk of endometriosis recurrence (low quality evidence); (v) deep invasive endometriosis might progress with ovarian stimulation (very low quality evidence). In conclusion, available evidence is generally reassuring (at least for IVF) and does not justify aggressive clinical approaches such as prophylactic surgery before assisted reproductive technology treatment to prevent endometriosis progression or recurrence. However, further evidence is required before being able to reach definitive conclusions. In particular, the potential effects on deep invasive endometriosis and the possible synergistic effect of stimulation and pregnancy are two areas that need to be explored further.
No
English
Endometriosis; Intrauterine insemination; IVF; Ovarian stimulation; Recurrence
Settore MED/40 - Ginecologia e Ostetricia
Review essay
Esperti anonimi
Pubblicazione scientifica
feb-2019
Elsevier
38
2
185
194
10
Pubblicato
Periodico con rilevanza internazionale
scopus
Aderisco
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Ovarian stimulation and endometriosis progression or recurrence: a systematic review / E. Somigliana, P. Vigano, L. Benaglia, A. Busnelli, A. Paffoni, P. Vercellini. - In: REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE. - ISSN 1472-6483. - 38:2(2019 Feb), pp. 185-194. [10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.11.021]
open
Prodotti della ricerca::01 - Articolo su periodico
6
262
Article (author)
no
E. Somigliana, P. Vigano, L. Benaglia, A. Busnelli, A. Paffoni, P. Vercellini
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Somigliana et al., Text CLEAN.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Post-print, accepted manuscript ecc. (versione accettata dall'editore)
Dimensione 479.92 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
479.92 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
1-s2.0-S1472648318306345-main.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 556.29 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
556.29 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/697814
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 22
  • Scopus 67
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 49
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact