Nasal pressure measured during sniff (SNIP) is a technically simple voluntary test. Since the contraction of the diaphragm expands the abdomen, the volume variation during sniff manoeuvre should therefore be predominantly abdominal in order to be considered a specific index of diaphragm strength. We aimed to verify if and how SNIP varied according to thoraco-abdominal volume variations. We measured abdominal volume variations, using opto-electronic plethysmography, during quiet breathing (ABQB) and sniff manoeuvres (ABSN) in supine position on 30 patients (age: 42; FVC:47.5%; FEV1:30%) on the waiting list for lung transplant. SNIP was measured simultaneously with ABSN. 68 sniff were analysed and classified into 4 groups according to ABSN: 16 with thoracic paradox, 24 predominantly abdominal, 16 predominantly thoracic and 12 with abdominal paradox. By definition ABSN was different (p<0.001) among the 4 groups, whereas ABQB (~75%; p=0.373) and SNIP (~53 cmH2O, p= 0.792) were similar (figure 1). SNIP did not change with the different thoraco-abdominal strategies. The diaphragm was not weak and leaded inspiration, therefore ABSN varied because the patients misperformed the manoeuvre. In order to not misunderstand the clinical significance of a sniff test, care should be paid also in thoraco-abdominal movement because SNIP, per se, cannot differentiate between thoracic or diaphragmatic manoeuvre with the risk to lose its specificity.

Sniff test: does what we measure at the nose reflect what happens in the chest wall? / A. Lomauro, C. Martorana, A. Aliverti, M. Nosotti, A. Palleschi, E. Privitera. ((Intervento presentato al convegno ERS International Congress tenutosi a Madrid nel 2019.

Sniff test: does what we measure at the nose reflect what happens in the chest wall?

M. Nosotti;A. Palleschi;
2019

Abstract

Nasal pressure measured during sniff (SNIP) is a technically simple voluntary test. Since the contraction of the diaphragm expands the abdomen, the volume variation during sniff manoeuvre should therefore be predominantly abdominal in order to be considered a specific index of diaphragm strength. We aimed to verify if and how SNIP varied according to thoraco-abdominal volume variations. We measured abdominal volume variations, using opto-electronic plethysmography, during quiet breathing (ABQB) and sniff manoeuvres (ABSN) in supine position on 30 patients (age: 42; FVC:47.5%; FEV1:30%) on the waiting list for lung transplant. SNIP was measured simultaneously with ABSN. 68 sniff were analysed and classified into 4 groups according to ABSN: 16 with thoracic paradox, 24 predominantly abdominal, 16 predominantly thoracic and 12 with abdominal paradox. By definition ABSN was different (p<0.001) among the 4 groups, whereas ABQB (~75%; p=0.373) and SNIP (~53 cmH2O, p= 0.792) were similar (figure 1). SNIP did not change with the different thoraco-abdominal strategies. The diaphragm was not weak and leaded inspiration, therefore ABSN varied because the patients misperformed the manoeuvre. In order to not misunderstand the clinical significance of a sniff test, care should be paid also in thoraco-abdominal movement because SNIP, per se, cannot differentiate between thoracic or diaphragmatic manoeuvre with the risk to lose its specificity.
No
English
set-2019
Settore MED/21 - Chirurgia Toracica
Presentazione
Intervento inviato
Comitato scientifico
Pubblicazione scientifica
ERS International Congress
Madrid
2019
European Respiratory Society
Convegno internazionale
crossref
A. Lomauro, C. Martorana, A. Aliverti, M. Nosotti, A. Palleschi, E. Privitera
Sniff test: does what we measure at the nose reflect what happens in the chest wall? / A. Lomauro, C. Martorana, A. Aliverti, M. Nosotti, A. Palleschi, E. Privitera. ((Intervento presentato al convegno ERS International Congress tenutosi a Madrid nel 2019.
Prodotti della ricerca::14 - Intervento a convegno non pubblicato
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
open
Conference Object
6
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
ERS 2019 abstact.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Altro
Dimensione 263.08 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
263.08 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/697022
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact