Review article: newer optical and digital chromoendoscopy techniques vs. dye-based chromoendoscopy for diagnosis and surveillance in inflammatory bowel disease

BackgroundRecent innovations in gastrointestinal endoscopy have changed our traditional approach to diagnosis and therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). While traditionally used dye-based chromoendoscopy (DBC) techniques suffer from several limitations that reduce their utility in daily routine practice, newer dye-less' chromoendoscopy (DLC) techniques offer a great potential to overcome most of these limitations. AimTo review available optical and digital chromoendoscopy techniques, by critically discussing their potential for diagnostic and surveillance colonoscopy in patients with IBD. MethodsA literature search on the use of dye-less and dye-based chromoendoscopy in IBD patients was performed. ResultsIn long-standing IBD, DBC improves detection of dysplasia (diagnostic odds ratio=17.5, 95% CI=1.2-247.1) as well as prediction of inflammatory disease activity and extent of disease compared with standard video-colonoscopy. Narrow band imaging (NBI) shows no improvement in dysplasia detection rates compared with white-light endoscopy and DBC (P=0.6). Moreover, NBI results in a suboptimal differentiation of dysplastic from nondysplastic lesions. No data regarding digital DLC techniques (i.e. FICE, i-scan) for dysplasia detection in IBD are yet available. Both NBI and i-scan are superior to white-light endoscopy in assessing the activity and extent of colorectal IBD. ConclusionsAlthough the potential benefits of newer optical and digital dye-less chromoendoscopy techniques over traditionally used DBC are substantial, only DBC can currently be recommended to improve dysplasia detection in long-standing IBD. In contrast, DLC has the potential to quantify disease activity and mucosal healing in IBD.