Objective: To evaluate in vitro the sealing capability at the prosthetic connection interface of 2 conometric systems. Materials and Methods: Two conometric systems with the same design and different material were used, for a total of 24 samples. Each sample was assembled by a tapered abutment and respective coping. In group A, the copings were made of gold, whereas in group B they were made of PEEK. Three mL of mix bacterial suspension (Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, and Fusobacterium nucleatum species) was inoculated into the abutment screw hole, and the coping was inserted on the abutment. Samples were immersed into culture tubes and incubated for 24, 48, and 72 hours into anaerobic conditions. Visual evaluation of turbidity was performed at each time point. Qualitativequantitative assessment using realtime polymerase chain reaction was performed at 72 hours. Any difference between the groups was checked by means of Fisher exact test. Results: Microbial leakage occurred in both groups, and there was no statistically significant difference between groups. Microbial concentration resulted in a presence inferior to 1 × 102 copies/mL in all positive assemblies. Conclusions: Because of the low bacterial count, it can be concluded that a minimal bacterial infiltration may be allowed by conometric interfaces for prosthetic connection.

Microbial leakage at morse taper conometric prosthetic connection : an in vitro investigation / E. Bressan, M. Stocchero, R. Jimbo, C. Rosati, E. Fanti, C. Tomasi, D. Lops. - In: IMPLANT DENTISTRY. - ISSN 1056-6163. - 26:5(2017), pp. 756-761.

Microbial leakage at morse taper conometric prosthetic connection : an in vitro investigation

D. Lops
2017

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate in vitro the sealing capability at the prosthetic connection interface of 2 conometric systems. Materials and Methods: Two conometric systems with the same design and different material were used, for a total of 24 samples. Each sample was assembled by a tapered abutment and respective coping. In group A, the copings were made of gold, whereas in group B they were made of PEEK. Three mL of mix bacterial suspension (Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, and Fusobacterium nucleatum species) was inoculated into the abutment screw hole, and the coping was inserted on the abutment. Samples were immersed into culture tubes and incubated for 24, 48, and 72 hours into anaerobic conditions. Visual evaluation of turbidity was performed at each time point. Qualitativequantitative assessment using realtime polymerase chain reaction was performed at 72 hours. Any difference between the groups was checked by means of Fisher exact test. Results: Microbial leakage occurred in both groups, and there was no statistically significant difference between groups. Microbial concentration resulted in a presence inferior to 1 × 102 copies/mL in all positive assemblies. Conclusions: Because of the low bacterial count, it can be concluded that a minimal bacterial infiltration may be allowed by conometric interfaces for prosthetic connection.
Bacterial count; Bacterial microleakage; Dental implant; Morse taper conometric system; Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans; Dental Implant-Abutment Design; Dental Implants; Dental Leakage; Fusobacterium nucleatum; Humans; In Vitro Techniques; Porphyromonas gingivalis; Dental Abutments
Settore MED/28 - Malattie Odontostomatologiche
2017
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Microbial_Leakage_at_Morse_Taper_Conometric.18.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 304.45 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
304.45 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/675713
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus 17
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 16
social impact