This study aimed to analyze the effect of different knee starting angles on jump performance, kinetic parameters, and intersegmental coupling coordination during a squat jump (SJ) and a countermovement jump (CMJ). Twenty male volleyball and basketball players volunteered to participate in this study. The CMJ was performed with knee flexion at the end of the countermovement phase smaller than 90 (CMJ(<90)), greater than 90 degrees (CMJ(>90)), and in a preferred position (CMJ(PREF)), while the SJ was performed from a knee angle of 70 degrees (SJ(70)), 90 degrees (SJ(90)), 110 degrees (SJ(110)), and in a preferred position (SJ(PREF)). The best jump performance was observed in jumps that started from a higher squat depth (CMJ(<90)-SJ(70)) and in the preferred positions (CMJ and SJ), while peak power was observed in the SJ(110), and CMJ(>90). Analysis of continuous relative phase showed that thigh-trunk coupling was more in-phase in the jumps (CMJ and SJ) performed with a higher squat depth, while the leg-thigh coupling was more in-phase in the CMJ(>90) and SJ(PREF). Jumping from a position with knees more flexed seems to be the best strategy to achieve the best performance. Intersegmental coordination and jump performance (CMJ and SJ) were affected by different knee starting angles.

Effect of different knee starting angles on intersegmental coordination and performance in vertical jumps / G. Gheller Rodrigo, J. Dal Pupo, J. Ache-Dias, D. Detanico, J. Padulo, G. dos Santos Saray. - In: HUMAN MOVEMENT SCIENCE. - ISSN 1872-7646. - 42(2015 Aug), pp. 71-80. [10.1016/j.humov.2015.04.010]

Effect of different knee starting angles on intersegmental coordination and performance in vertical jumps

J. Padulo
Penultimo
;
2015

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the effect of different knee starting angles on jump performance, kinetic parameters, and intersegmental coupling coordination during a squat jump (SJ) and a countermovement jump (CMJ). Twenty male volleyball and basketball players volunteered to participate in this study. The CMJ was performed with knee flexion at the end of the countermovement phase smaller than 90 (CMJ(<90)), greater than 90 degrees (CMJ(>90)), and in a preferred position (CMJ(PREF)), while the SJ was performed from a knee angle of 70 degrees (SJ(70)), 90 degrees (SJ(90)), 110 degrees (SJ(110)), and in a preferred position (SJ(PREF)). The best jump performance was observed in jumps that started from a higher squat depth (CMJ(<90)-SJ(70)) and in the preferred positions (CMJ and SJ), while peak power was observed in the SJ(110), and CMJ(>90). Analysis of continuous relative phase showed that thigh-trunk coupling was more in-phase in the jumps (CMJ and SJ) performed with a higher squat depth, while the leg-thigh coupling was more in-phase in the CMJ(>90) and SJ(PREF). Jumping from a position with knees more flexed seems to be the best strategy to achieve the best performance. Intersegmental coordination and jump performance (CMJ and SJ) were affected by different knee starting angles.
continuous relative phase; kinematic; kinetic; motor control; power output; acceleration; adult; basketball; biomechanical phenomena; humans; knee joint; male; motor skills; psychomotor performance; range of motion; articular; volleyball; weight-bearing; young adult;
Settore M-EDF/02 - Metodi e Didattiche delle Attivita' Sportive
ago-2015
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Gheller 2015 HMS Effect of different knee starting angles on intersegmental coordination and performance in vertical jumps.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 710.45 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
710.45 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/670893
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 25
  • Scopus 80
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 73
social impact