During the last decades, the discipline of cultural sociology has produced a considerable amount of knowledge on cultural production. Institutional approaches, notably inspired by DiMaggio and Powell (1982) classical article, have notably given the production of culture perspective (Peterson and Anand, 2004). Field analysis (Bourdieu, 1979) have inspired many works that have enlighted the link between social boundaries (Lamont and Molnar, 2002) of cultural practices. Symbolic interactionism, best represented by Howard Becker art worlds (1982) explored the different modes of collaboration between actors and have highlighten the collective aspect of artistic production. Finally, study of mediations have highlighten the role of artworks in constructing social life (Hennion, 1993 ; DeNora, 2000). All these theoretical fields of study have produced a considerable empirical knowledge of different artistic fields, in different countries, both at the level of production and consumption. At the same time, cultural policies seems to take a more and more important position in political life. The best exemple of this might be the dynamism around the 2005 UNESCO convention on the promotion and protection of the diversity of cultural expressions. This convention is used, for instance, by State Parties to inspire cultural policies that they want to develop. It is also used as a platform of exchange of good practices, that it tries to define through directives. For instance, the last Conference of Parties has stated that net neutrality was necessary to cultural diversity. However, the knowledge produced by cultural sociology, mainly through qualitative methods, is curiously absent of the debates of the organization, that produces reports mainly based on quantitative approaches, and make little or no reference to the corpus we have enunciated. This absence can also be found in different states. In our presentation, we will explore some of the possible ways in which the theoretical and empirical knowledge produced in cultural sociology can practically inform arts policies and provide useful practical tools for their conception.

Cultural sociology as a tool for art policies / A. Battentier. ((Intervento presentato al 10. convegno ESA midterm conference of the RN02 and RN07 tenutosi a Valetta nel 2018.

Cultural sociology as a tool for art policies

A. Battentier
2018

Abstract

During the last decades, the discipline of cultural sociology has produced a considerable amount of knowledge on cultural production. Institutional approaches, notably inspired by DiMaggio and Powell (1982) classical article, have notably given the production of culture perspective (Peterson and Anand, 2004). Field analysis (Bourdieu, 1979) have inspired many works that have enlighted the link between social boundaries (Lamont and Molnar, 2002) of cultural practices. Symbolic interactionism, best represented by Howard Becker art worlds (1982) explored the different modes of collaboration between actors and have highlighten the collective aspect of artistic production. Finally, study of mediations have highlighten the role of artworks in constructing social life (Hennion, 1993 ; DeNora, 2000). All these theoretical fields of study have produced a considerable empirical knowledge of different artistic fields, in different countries, both at the level of production and consumption. At the same time, cultural policies seems to take a more and more important position in political life. The best exemple of this might be the dynamism around the 2005 UNESCO convention on the promotion and protection of the diversity of cultural expressions. This convention is used, for instance, by State Parties to inspire cultural policies that they want to develop. It is also used as a platform of exchange of good practices, that it tries to define through directives. For instance, the last Conference of Parties has stated that net neutrality was necessary to cultural diversity. However, the knowledge produced by cultural sociology, mainly through qualitative methods, is curiously absent of the debates of the organization, that produces reports mainly based on quantitative approaches, and make little or no reference to the corpus we have enunciated. This absence can also be found in different states. In our presentation, we will explore some of the possible ways in which the theoretical and empirical knowledge produced in cultural sociology can practically inform arts policies and provide useful practical tools for their conception.
7-set-2018
cultural policies; unesco; cultural diversity; vulgarization
Settore SPS/08 - Sociologia dei Processi Culturali e Comunicativi
Cultural sociology as a tool for art policies / A. Battentier. ((Intervento presentato al 10. convegno ESA midterm conference of the RN02 and RN07 tenutosi a Valetta nel 2018.
Conference Object
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Proposal_Andy_Battentier.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Post-print, accepted manuscript ecc. (versione accettata dall'editore)
Dimensione 96.8 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
96.8 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/669491
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact