The term empathy has become a linguistic commonplace in everyday communication as well as in interdisciplinary research. The results of the research questions, raised in the last hundred (and more) years, coming from different areas, such as aesthetics, psychology, neurosciences, literary theory, lack in fact a clear concept of empathy. Not surprisingly a recent paper has identified up to 43 distinct definitions of empathy in academic publications. By reconstructing the main research lines on empathy, our paper highlights the reasons for this conceptual inadequacy and the deficiencies in the theorization of empathy that create misleading interpretations thereof. Along the line connecting Plato’s insights on empathic experiences to the present neuroscientific experiments, a broad spectrum of issues is deployed for which “empathy” functions as an umbrella term covering a net of categorial relationships – projection, transfer, association, expression, animation, anthropomorphization, vivification, fusion, sympathy – that only partially overlap. Our paper therefore recommends that “empathy” should not be assumed as a self-evident notion, but instead preliminarily clarified in its definition every time we decide to have recourse to it.
Empathy or Empathies? Uncertainties in the Interdisciplinary Discussion / A. Pinotti, M. Salgaro. - In: GESTALT THEORY. - ISSN 2519-5808. - 41:2(2019), pp. 141-158. [10.2478/gth-2019-0015]
Empathy or Empathies? Uncertainties in the Interdisciplinary Discussion
A. Pinotti;
2019
Abstract
The term empathy has become a linguistic commonplace in everyday communication as well as in interdisciplinary research. The results of the research questions, raised in the last hundred (and more) years, coming from different areas, such as aesthetics, psychology, neurosciences, literary theory, lack in fact a clear concept of empathy. Not surprisingly a recent paper has identified up to 43 distinct definitions of empathy in academic publications. By reconstructing the main research lines on empathy, our paper highlights the reasons for this conceptual inadequacy and the deficiencies in the theorization of empathy that create misleading interpretations thereof. Along the line connecting Plato’s insights on empathic experiences to the present neuroscientific experiments, a broad spectrum of issues is deployed for which “empathy” functions as an umbrella term covering a net of categorial relationships – projection, transfer, association, expression, animation, anthropomorphization, vivification, fusion, sympathy – that only partially overlap. Our paper therefore recommends that “empathy” should not be assumed as a self-evident notion, but instead preliminarily clarified in its definition every time we decide to have recourse to it.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
2019-PINOTTI & SALGARO-Empathy or Empathies Uncertainties in the Interdisciplinary Discussion-[Gestalt Theory].pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Pinotti Salgaro Empathy
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione
485 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
485 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.