To develop response criteria for juvenile dermatomyositis (DM). We analysed the performance of 312 definitions that used core set measures from either the International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Group (IMACS) or the Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation (PRINTO) and were derived from natural history data and a conjoint analysis survey. They were further validated using data from the PRINTO trial of prednisone alone compared to prednisone with methotrexate or cyclosporine and the Rituximab in Myositis (RIM) trial. At a consensus conference, experts considered 14 top candidate criteria based on their performance characteristics and clinical face validity, using nominal group technique. Consensus was reached for a conjoint analysis-based continuous model with a total improvement score of 0-100, using absolute per cent change in core set measures of minimal (>= 30), moderate (>= 45), and major (>= 70) improvement. The same criteria were chosen for adult DM/polymyositis, with differing thresholds for improvement. The sensitivity and specificity were 89% and 91-98% for minimal improvement, 92-94% and 94-99% for moderate improvement, and 91-98% and 85-86% for major improvement, respectively, in juvenile DM patient cohorts using the IMACS and PRINTO core set measures. These criteria were validated in the PRINTO trial for differentiating between treatment arms for minimal and moderate improvement (p= 0.009-0.057) and in the RIM trial for significantly differentiating the physician's rating for improvement (p< 0.006). The response criteria for juvenile DM consisted of a conjoint analysis-based model using a continuous improvement score based on absolute per cent change in core set measures, with thresholds for minimal, moderate, and major improvement.

2016 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism criteria for minimal, moderate, and major clinical response in juvenile dermatomyositis: An International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Group/Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation collaborative initiative / L.G. Rider, R. Aggarwal, A. Pistorio, N. Bayat, B. Erman, B.M. Feldman, A.M. Huber, R. Cimaz, R.J. Cuttica, S.K. De Oliveira, C.B. Lindsley, C.A. Pilkington, M. Punaro, A. Ravelli, A.M. Reed, K. Rouster-Stevens, A. Van Royen-Kerkhof, F. Dressler, C.S. Magalhaes, T. Constantin, J.E. Davidson, B. Magnusson, R. Russo, L. Villa, M. Rinaldi, H. Rockette, P.A. Lachenbruch, F.W. Miller, J. Vencovsky, N. Ruperto. - In: ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES. - ISSN 0003-4967. - 76:5(2017), pp. 782-791. [10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211401]

2016 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism criteria for minimal, moderate, and major clinical response in juvenile dermatomyositis: An International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Group/Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation collaborative initiative

R. Cimaz;
2017

Abstract

To develop response criteria for juvenile dermatomyositis (DM). We analysed the performance of 312 definitions that used core set measures from either the International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Group (IMACS) or the Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation (PRINTO) and were derived from natural history data and a conjoint analysis survey. They were further validated using data from the PRINTO trial of prednisone alone compared to prednisone with methotrexate or cyclosporine and the Rituximab in Myositis (RIM) trial. At a consensus conference, experts considered 14 top candidate criteria based on their performance characteristics and clinical face validity, using nominal group technique. Consensus was reached for a conjoint analysis-based continuous model with a total improvement score of 0-100, using absolute per cent change in core set measures of minimal (>= 30), moderate (>= 45), and major (>= 70) improvement. The same criteria were chosen for adult DM/polymyositis, with differing thresholds for improvement. The sensitivity and specificity were 89% and 91-98% for minimal improvement, 92-94% and 94-99% for moderate improvement, and 91-98% and 85-86% for major improvement, respectively, in juvenile DM patient cohorts using the IMACS and PRINTO core set measures. These criteria were validated in the PRINTO trial for differentiating between treatment arms for minimal and moderate improvement (p= 0.009-0.057) and in the RIM trial for significantly differentiating the physician's rating for improvement (p< 0.006). The response criteria for juvenile DM consisted of a conjoint analysis-based model using a continuous improvement score based on absolute per cent change in core set measures, with thresholds for minimal, moderate, and major improvement.
Disease-activity score; preliminary definition; adult polymyositis; conjoint-analysis; core set; improvement; validation; therapy; consensus; children
Settore MED/16 - Reumatologia
Settore MED/38 - Pediatria Generale e Specialistica
2017
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
nihms868182.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Pre-print (manoscritto inviato all'editore)
Dimensione 491.17 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
491.17 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
WOS000398387200005.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 564.18 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
564.18 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/666531
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 13
  • Scopus 34
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 25
social impact